Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

David Hann's Ratings and Endorsements

Office: State Senate (MN) - District 48, Republican Minority Leader

Labor Unions

2014 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 0%
2014 Minnesota Nurses Association - Positions on Nursing, Health Care, and Workforce Issues 22%
2013 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 0%
2013 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 6%
2013 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Lifetime Score 8%
2013 Minnesota Nurses Association - Positions on Nursing, Health Care, and Workforce Issues 9%
2012 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 0%
2012 Minnesota Nurses Association - Positions on Nursing, Health Care, and Workforce Issues 0%
2011 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Lifetime Score 10%
2011 Minnesota Nurses Association - Positions 0%
2010 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 0%
2010 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Lifetime Score 24%
2010 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Positions 13%
2010 Minnesota Nurses Association - Positions 0%
2009 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 0%
2009 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 18%
2009 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Positions 36%
2008 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions on Workplace Rights 0
2008 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 0
2007 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions on Workplace Rights 0
2007 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions on Workplace Rights 12
2006 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 0%
2006 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 36%
2005 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 0%
2005 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 6%
2004 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 33%
2004 AFSCME Joint Councils 6, 14, 65, & 96, AFL-CIO - Positions 20%
2004 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 0%
2003 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 0%
2003 AFSCME Joint Councils 6, 14, 65, & 96, AFL-CIO - Positions 0%
2003 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top