Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

David Senjem's Ratings and Endorsements

Office: State Senate (MN) - District 25, Republican

Abortion

2016 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 100%
2015 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions[Excused and Present not counted] 100%
2014 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions [Excused and Present not counted] 100%
2014 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 0%
2013 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 25%
2012 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions [Factoring excused and no-votes] 100%
2012 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions [Excused and no-votes not counted] 100%
2012 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 0%
2011 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 93%
2010 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions on Reproductive Rights 0%
2009 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 100%
2008 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions on Pro-Life Policy 100
2008 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions on Reproductive Rights 0
2007 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 89
2007 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions on Reproductive Rights 25
2006 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 100%
2006 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 0%
2005 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 100%
2005 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 0%
2004 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 80%
2004 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 67%
2003 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 100%
2003 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 17%

Labor Unions

2016 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 0%
2015 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 40%
2015 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Positions 50
2015 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Lifetime Score 32
2014 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 40%
2014 Minnesota Nurses Association - Positions on Nursing, Health Care, and Workforce Issues 52%
2013 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 20%
2013 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Lifetime Score 23%
2013 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 31%
2013 Minnesota Nurses Association - Positions on Nursing, Health Care, and Workforce Issues 18%
2012 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 0%
2012 Minnesota Nurses Association - Positions on Nursing, Health Care, and Workforce Issues 25%
2011 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Lifetime Score 23%
2011 Minnesota Nurses Association - Positions 0%
2010 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 0%
2010 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Positions 21%
2010 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Lifetime Score 36%
2010 Minnesota Nurses Association - Positions 11%
2009 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 0%
2009 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 39%
2009 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Positions 50%
2009 SEIU Minnesota State Council - Positions 0%
2008 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions on Workplace Rights 20
2008 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 20
2007 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions on Workplace Rights 20
2007 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions on Workplace Rights 17
2007 SEIU Minnesota State Council - Positions on Workplace Rights 17%
2006 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 0%
2006 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 55%
2005 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 0%
2005 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 29%
2004 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 80%
2004 AFSCME Joint Councils 6, 14, 65, & 96, AFL-CIO - Positions 50%
2004 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 17%
2003 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 0%
2003 AFSCME Joint Councils 6, 14, 65, & 96, AFL-CIO - Positions 0%
2003 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 18%

Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity

2008 OutFront Minnesota - Positions 19%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top