Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Leonard L. Boswell's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Environment

Environment

2012 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 61%
2012 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 46%
2011-2012 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 56%
2011-2012 Environment America - Positions 11%
2011-2012 Food Policy Action - Positions 64%
2011-2012 League of Conservation Voters - Session Score 56%
2011-2012 National Parks Conservation Association - Positions (House Only) 43%
2011 Environment America - Positions 63%
2011 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 66%
2011 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 63%
2011 Sierra Club - Positions on Clean Water (House Only) 58%
2011 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions (House Only) 77
2010-2011 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 70%
2010 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 62%
2010 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 80%
2009-2010 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 100%
2009-2010 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 88%
2009-2010 National Parks Conservation Association - Positions 83%
2009 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 100%
2009 Environment America - Positions 100%
2009 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 93%
2008 Environment America - Positions 85%
2007-2008 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 69%
2007-2008 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 79%
2007 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 70%
2007 League of Conservation Voters - First Session Score 75%
2006-2012 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 14%
2006 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 50%
2006 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 100%
2005-2006 American Forest and Paper Association - Positions 70%
2005-2006 American Lands Alliance - Positions 0%
2005-2006 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 66%
2005-2006 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 48%
2005-2006 Partnership for America - Positions 46%
2005 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 67%
2005 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 50%
2004 Center for International Policy - Positions 100%
2004 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 40%
2003-2004 American Lands Alliance - Positions 38%
2003-2004 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 64%
2003-2004 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 65%
2003-2004 National Parks Conservation Association - Positions 50%
2003-2004 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 81%
2003 American Lands Alliance - Positions 50%
2003 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 70%
2003 Sierra Club - Positions 88%
2002 Californians for Population Stabilization - Positions 33%
2001-2002 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 60%
2001-2002 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 73%
2001-2002 National Parks Conservation Association - Positions 67%
2001-2002 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 74%
2001 Californians for Population Stabilization - Positions 50%
1999-2000 American Lands Alliance - Positions 0%
1999-2000 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 53%
1999-2000 National Parks Conservation Association - Positions 87%
1999 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 50%
1998 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 34%
1997 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 31%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top