Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Eugene Pelowski, Jr.'s Ratings and Endorsements

Office: State House (MN) - 28A, Democratic/Farmer/Labor
On The Ballot: Running, Democratic/Farmer/Labor for State House - 28A

Abortion

2014 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions [Excused and Present not counted] 100%
2014 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 0%
2013 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 20%
2012 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions [Excused and no-votes not counted] 100%
2012 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions [Factoring excused and no-votes] 100%
2012 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 0%
2011 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 79%
2010 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions on Reproductive Rights 25%
2009 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 75%
2008 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions on Pro-Life Policy 100
2008 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions on Reproductive Rights 27
2007 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 100
2007 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions on Reproductive Rights 42
2006 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 80%
2006 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 0%
2005 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 100%
2005 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 0%
2004 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 100%
2004 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 0%
2003 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 100%
2003 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 0%
2002 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 67%
2001 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 100%
2001 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 0%
2000 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 79%
1999 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 100%
1999 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 0%
1998 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 75%
1998 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 0%
1998 Planned Parenthood of Minnesota Advocate - Positions 0%
1996 Planned Parenthood of Minnesota Advocate - Positions on Reproductive Rights 0%

Business and Consumers

2016 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions 100%
2015 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions 55%
2014 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions 38%
2013-2014 Minnesota National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 50%
2013 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions 22%
2012 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions 60%
2011-2012 Minnesota National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 80%
2010 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions 0%
2009-2010 Minnesota National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 45%
2009 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions 69%
2008 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions on Pro-Business Policy 83
2007-2008 Minnesota National Federation of Independent Business - Positions on Pro-Small Business Policy 33
2007 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions on Pro-Business Policy 25
2006 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions 100%
2005-2006 Minnesota National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 63%
2005 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions 38%
2004 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions 46%
2003-2004 Minnesota National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 64%
2002 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions 40%
2001-2002 Minnesota National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 60%
2001 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions 33%
2001 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions (Energy Policy) 100%
2001 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions (Environmental Policy) 50%
2001 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions (Healthcare Policy) 0%
2001 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions (Labor Policy) 0%
1999-2000 Minnesota National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 77%
1997-1998 Minnesota National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 36%

Labor Unions

2015 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Positions 79
2015 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Lifetime Score 84
2014 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 80%
2014 Minnesota Nurses Association - Positions on Nursing, Health Care, and Workforce Issues 74%
2013-2014 SEIU Minnesota State Council - Positions (House) 82%
2013 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 80%
2013 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 88%
2013 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Lifetime Score 81%
2013 Minnesota Nurses Association - Positions on Nursing, Health Care, and Workforce Issues 59%
2012 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 88%
2012 Minnesota Nurses Association - Positions on Nursing, Health Care, and Workforce Issues 75%
2011 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Lifetime Score 81%
2011 Minnesota Nurses Association - Positions 67%
2010 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 60%
2010 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Lifetime Score 74%
2010 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Positions 88%
2010 Minnesota Nurses Association - Positions 74%
2009 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 43%
2009 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 67%
2009 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Positions 60%
2008 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions on Workplace Rights 100
2008 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 100
2008 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Positions on Workplace Rights 69
2007 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions on Workplace Rights 80
2007 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions on Workplace Rights 87
2006 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 100%
2006 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 94%
2005 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 80%
2005 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 89%
2004 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 100%
2004 AFSCME Joint Councils 6, 14, 65, & 96, AFL-CIO - Positions 60%
2004 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 85%
2004 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Positions 100%
2003 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 100%
2003 AFSCME Joint Councils 6, 14, 65, & 96, AFL-CIO - Positions 80%
2003 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 81%
2001 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 90%
2001 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions (Labor Policy) 0%
2000 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 100%
1999 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 67%
1998 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 85%

Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity

2008 OutFront Minnesota - Positions 59%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top