Representative Erik Paulsen's Special Interest Group Ratings

Biographical

Full Name: Erik Paulsen
Current Office: U.S. House - District 3, Republican
First Elected: 11/04/2008
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2014
Gender: Male
Family: Wife: Kelly; 4 Children: Cassie, Briana, Tayler, Liesl
Birth Date: 05/14/1965
Birth Place: Bakersfield, CA
Home City: Eden Prairie, MN
Religion: Lutheran
View 2012 Endorsements
Filter by Issue
How To Interpret These Evaluations

Abortion

2013 Planned Parenthood - Positions (Feb 26, 2013 0% 2012 Planned Parenthood - Positions 0% 2011-2012 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100% 2011 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0% 2011 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100% 2010 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0% 2010 Planned Parenthood - Positions 0% 2009-2010 National Family Planning & Reproductive Health Association - House of Representatives Score 0% 2009-2010 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100% 2009 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0% 2009 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100% 2008 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions on Pro-Life Policy 90 2008 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions on Reproductive Rights 0 2007 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 100 2007 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions on Reproductive Rights 8 2006 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 100% 2006 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 0% 2005 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 100% 2005 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 0% 2004 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 0% 2003 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 100% 2003 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 0% 2002 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 100% 2001 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 92% 2001 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 17% 2000 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 100% 1999 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 100% 1999 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 0% 1998 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 100% 1998 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 0% 1998 Planned Parenthood of Minnesota Action Fund - Positions 0% 1996 Planned Parenthood of Minnesota Action Fund - Positions on Reproductive Rights 0%

Business and Consumers

2012 National Electrical Contractors Association - Positions 60% 2012 TechCrunch/CrunchGov - Positions on Technology Industry 75% 2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Conservative Action Score 70% 2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Liberal Action Score 7% 2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 19% 2011 National Electrical Contractors Association - Positions (House Only) 100% 2011 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 100% 2011 National Retail Federation - Positions 100% 2011 National Small Business Association - Positions 66% 2011 National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association - Positions 100% 2011 The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions 100% 2011 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 100% 2010 The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions 75% 2010 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 88% 2009-2010 American Council of Engineering Companies - Positions 50% 2009-2010 Associated General Contractors of America - Positions 87% 2009-2010 International Warehouse Logistics Association - Positions 80% 2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Action Score 48 2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 31% 2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 9% 2009-2010 National Association of Manufacturers - Positions 78% 2009-2010 National Retail Federation - Positions 100% 2009-2010 National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association - Positions 66% 2009-2010 Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council - Positions 100% 2009 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 87% 2008 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions on Pro-Business Policy 80 2007 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions on Pro-Business Policy 90 2006 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions 75% 2005-2006 Minnesota National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 100% 2005 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions 88% 2004 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions 85% 2003-2004 Minnesota National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 100% 2002 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions 82% 2001-2002 Minnesota National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 100% 2001 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions 100% 1999-2000 Minnesota National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 94% 1997-1998 Minnesota National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 91%

Civil Liberties and Civil Rights

2012 Open Doors USA - Positions 50% 2011-2012 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 0% 2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Conservative Action Score 70% 2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 19% 2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Liberal Action Score 7% 2011 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions (House Only) 0% 2009-2010 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 6% 2009-2010 Arab American Institute - Positions 0% 2009-2010 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 0% 2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Action Score 48 2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 31% 2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 9% 2009-2010 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 11% 2009-2010 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 20% 2009 American Library Association - Positions 13% 2009 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 7% 2009 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Action Score 48% 2009 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 28% 2007 OutFront Minnesota - Positions 0% 2004 OutFront Minnesota - Positions on LGBT Rights 0% 1993-2006 OutFront Minnesota - Positions on LGBT Rights 0% 1993-2005 OutFront Minnesota - Positions on LGBT Rights 0%

Conservative

2012 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 87% 2012 American Conservative Union - Ratings of Congress 84% 2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 63% 2011 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 88% 2011 American Conservative Union - Positions 84% 2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 96% 2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 53% 2011 Heritage Action for America - Positions (House Only) 62% 2011 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 76% 2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 70% 2011 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 17% 2011 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 79% 2011 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 83% 2011 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 21% 2011 National Journal - Liberal Composite Score 24% 2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 27% 2011 The Club for Growth - Positions 64% 2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 80% 2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 90% 2011 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 80% 2010 American Conservative Union - Positions 92% 2010 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 90% 2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 88% 2010 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 29% 2010 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 31% 2010 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 69% 2010 National Journal - Liberal Composite Score 31% 2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 68% 2010 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 67% 2010 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 30% 2010 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 69% 2010 The Club for Growth - Positions 92% 2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 90% 2009-2010 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 85% 2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100% 2009-2010 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100% 2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 91% 2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 78% 2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 80% 2009 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 88% 2009 American Conservative Union - Positions 88% 2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100% 2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 90% 2009 Heritage Alliance - Positions 76% 2009 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 69% 2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 68% 2009 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 70% 2009 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 31% 2009 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 65% 2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 58% 2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 80% 2009 The Club for Growth - Positions 72% 2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2009) 50% 2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 90% 2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 70% 2007-2008 Minnesota Majority - Positions 91%

Employment and Affirmative Action

Environment

2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 19% 2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Liberal Action Score 7% 2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Conservative Action Score 70% 2011 Environment America - Positions 18% 2011 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 29% 2011 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 29% 2011 Sierra Club - Positions on Clean Water (House Only) 25% 2010 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 29% 2010 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 40% 2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Action Score 48 2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 31% 2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 9% 2009-2010 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 29% 2009 ConservAmerica - Positions 56 2009 Environment America - Positions 17% 2009 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 21% 2008-2011 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 100% 2008 Clean Water Action Alliance of Minnesota - Positions on Clean Water Policy 41% 2007 Conservation Minnesota - Positions on Environmental Conservation 40 2006 Clean Water Action Alliance of Minnesota - Positions 45% 2006 Conservation Minnesota - Positions 82% 2005-2006 Minnesota Sierra Club-North Star - Positions on Environmental Conservation 47 2005 Conservation Minnesota - Positions 13% 2004 Conservation Minnesota - Positions 33% 2003 Conservation Minnesota - Positions 20% 2002 Conservation Minnesota - Positions 38% 2001-2002 Minnesota Sierra Club-North Star - Positions 26% 2001 Conservation Minnesota - Positions 26% 2001 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce--Environmental Policy Votes - Positions 100% 2001 Minnesota Sierra Club-North Star - Positions 27% 1999-2000 Minnesota Sierra Club-North Star - Positions 0% 1999 Minnesota Sierra Club-North Star - Positions 0% 1997-1998 Minnesota Sierra Club-North Star - Positions 13% 1995-1996 Minnesota Sierra Club-North Star - Positions 0%

Labor Unions

2011-2012 United Food & Commercial Workers - Positions 0% 2011 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 0% 2011 Federally Employed Women - Positions 16% 2011 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 0% 2010 American Federation of Government Employees - Positions 0% 2010 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 0% 2010 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 0% 2010 Federally Employed Women - Positions 50% 2010 International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers - Positions 12% 2010 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - House of Representatives Score 0% 2009-2010 Communications Workers of America - Positions 0% 2009-2010 International Brotherhood of Teamsters - Positions 7% 2009-2010 International Foodservice Distributors Association - Positions 100% 2009-2010 National Association for the Self-Employed - U.S. House Score 50% 2009-2010 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 6% 2009 American Federation of Government Employees - Positions 8% 2009 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 14% 2009 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Lifetime Score 14% 2009 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 22% 2009 Federally Employed Women - Positions 30% 2009 International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers - Positions 33% 2009 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 0% 2009 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 18% 2009 Women Employed - Positions 0% 2008 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Positions on Workplace Rights 67 2007 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions on Workplace Rights 0 2007 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions on Workplace Rights 6 2006 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 0% 2006 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 13% 2005 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 0% 2005 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 6% 2004 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 40% 2004 AFSCME Joint Councils 6, 14, 65, & 96, AFL-CIO - Positions 20% 2004 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 0% 2004 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Positions 20% 2003 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 40% 2003 AFSCME Joint Councils 6, 14, 65, & 96, AFL-CIO - Positions 0% 2003 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 19% 2001 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 14% 2001 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce--Labor Policy Votes - Positions 100% 2000 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 14% 1999 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 17% 1998 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 8%

Liberal

2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Conservative Action Score 70% 2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Liberal Action Score 7% 2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 19% 2011 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 83% 2011 National Journal - Liberal Composite Score 24% 2011 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 76% 2011 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 21% 2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 27% 2011 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 79% 2011 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 17% 2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 70% 2010 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 0% 2010 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 29% 2010 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 30% 2010 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 31% 2010 National Journal - Liberal Composite Score 31% 2010 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 69% 2010 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 67% 2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 68% 2010 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 69% 2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 9% 2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 31% 2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Action Score 48 2009 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 10% 2009 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 7% 2009 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Action Score 48% 2009 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 29% 2009 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 26% 2009 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 31% 2009 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 69% 2009 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 33%

Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity

Social

2012 Catholic Advocate - Positions 100% 2012 Family Research Council - Positions 100% 2012 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 16% 2011 Family Research Council - Positions 90% 2011 Secular Coalition for America - Positions 17% 2010 Liberty Central - Positions on Conservative Issues A 2010 National Association of Social Workers - House of Representatives Score 0% 2009-2010 ACT! for America - Positions 100% 2009-2010 Family Research Council - Positions 93% 2009-2010 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 0% 2009 National Association of Social Workers - Positions 22% 2009 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 25% 2009 Population Connection - Committee Votes Score 0% 2008-2011 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 100% 2008 Legislative Evaluation Assembly of Minnesota, Inc. - Positions on Conservative Issues 63 2007-2010 National Latino Congreso/William C. Velásquez Institute - Positions 0% 2006 Legislative Evaluation Assembly of Minnesota, Inc. - Positions 76% 2004 Legislative Evaluation Assembly of Minnesota, Inc. - Positions 71 2003-2004 Joint Religious Legislative Coalition - Positions 0% 2003 Legislative Evaluation Assembly of Minnesota, Inc. - Positions 79% 2001-2002 Joint Religious Legislative Coalition - Positions 13% 2000 Joint Religious Legislative Coalition - Positions 0% 1999 Joint Religious Legislative Coalition - Positions 0% 1998 Joint Religious Legislative Coalition - Positions 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.