or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Alice Hausman

Alice Hausman's Ratings and Endorsements

Full Name: Alice Hausman
Current Office: State House - 66A, Democratic/Farmer/Labor
First Elected: 1989
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2014

Abortion

2013 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 100%
2012 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions [Excused and no-votes not counted] 0%
2012 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions [Factoring excused and no-votes] 0%
2012 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 100%
2011 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 7%
2010 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions on Reproductive Rights 100%
2009 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 0%
2008 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions on Pro-Life Policy 0
2008 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions on Reproductive Rights 100
2007 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 0
2007 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions on Reproductive Rights 100
2006 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 0%
2006 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 100%
2005 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 17%
2005 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 100%
2004 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 100%
2003 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 0%
2003 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 100%
2002 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 0%
2001 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 8%
2001 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 100%
2000 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 0%
1999 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 0%
1999 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 100%
1998 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 0%
1998 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 100%
1998 Planned Parenthood of Minnesota Action Fund - Positions 100%
1996 Planned Parenthood of Minnesota Action Fund - Positions on Reproductive Rights 100%

Labor Unions

2013 Minnesota Nurses Association - Positions on Nursing, Health Care, and Workforce Issues 64%
2012 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 100%
2012 Minnesota Nurses Association - Positions on Nursing, Health Care, and Workforce Issues 100%
2010 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 100%
2010 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Positions 94%
2010 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Lifetime Score 98%
2009 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 100%
2009 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 95%
2009 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Positions 100%
2008 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions on Workplace Rights 100
2008 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 94
2008 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Positions on Workplace Rights 100
2007 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions on Workplace Rights 100
2007 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions on Workplace Rights 100
2006 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 100%
2006 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 81%
2005 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 100%
2005 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 100%
2004 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 100%
2004 AFSCME Joint Councils 6, 14, 65, & 96, AFL-CIO - Positions 100%
2004 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 100%
2004 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Positions 100%
2003 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 80%
2003 AFSCME Joint Councils 6, 14, 65, & 96, AFL-CIO - Positions 100%
2003 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 88%
2001 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 95%
2001 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce--Labor Policy Votes - Positions 0%
2000 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 92%
1999 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 90%
1998 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 92%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top