Search Form
Now choose a category »
 

Mark Lunsford Pryor's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Women

Office: U.S. Senate (AR) - Sr, Democratic
On The Ballot: Running, Democratic for U.S. Senate

Women

2013 Concerned Women for America - Positions 27%
2013 Federally Employed Women - Positions 70%
2013 Jewish Women International - Positions 0%
2013 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 45%
2013 Young Women's Christian Association (YWCA) - Positions 33%
2012 Federally Employed Women - Positions 60%
2012 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2011-2012 American Association of University Women - Positions 70
2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 0%
2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 0%
2011 Federally Employed Women - Positions 100%
2011 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2010 Federally Employed Women - Positions 50%
2010 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2009-2010 American Association of University Women - Positions 70%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 16%
2009 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 55%
2009 Women Employed - Positions 100%
2008 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 60%
2007-2008 American Association of University Women - Positions 90%
2007-2008 Concerned Women for America - Positions 34%
2007-2008 Federally Employed Women - Equality in Government Score 60
2007-2008 National Organization for Women - Positions 81%
2007 American Association of University Women - Positions 83
2007 Federally Employed Women - Positions 60%
2007 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2006 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 45%
2005-2006 American Association of University Women - Positions 80%
2005-2006 Business and Professional Women USA - Positions 67%
2005-2006 Concerned Women for America - Positions 56%
2005-2006 Federally Employed Women - Positions 90%
2005-2006 National Organization for Women - Positions 74%
2005 American Association of University Women - Positions 67%
2005 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 75%
2005 National Organization for Women - Positions 75%
2005 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 66%
2004 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2003-2004 American Association of University Women - Positions 75%
2003-2004 Business and Professional Women USA - Positions 69%
2003-2004 Concerned Women for America - Positions 43%
2003-2004 Federally Employed Women - Positions 70%
2003-2004 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 77%
2003 American Association of University Women - Positions 80%
2003 American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists - Positions 100%
2003 Business and Professional Women USA - Positions 80%
2003 Concerned Women for America - Positions 33%
2003 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 29%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top