Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Mark Lunsford Pryor's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Labor Unions

Labor Unions

2014 United Food & Commercial Workers - Positions 92%
2013-2014 Workplace Choice - Positions 0
2013 American Federation of Government Employees - Positions 80%
2013 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 89%
2013 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Lifetime Score 83%
2013 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 100%
2013 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Lifetime Score 91%
2013 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 100%
2013 International Foodservice Distributors Association - Positions 25%
2012 American Federation of Government Employees - Positions 79
2012 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 83%
2012 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Lifetime Score 90%
2012 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 66%
2012 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 85%
2011-2012 American Federation of Teachers - Positions 86%
2011-2012 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers - Lifetime Scores (Senate Only) 75%
2011-2012 United Food & Commercial Workers - Positions 100%
2011 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 72%
2011 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 86%
2011 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Lifetime Score 91%
2011 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 100%
2010 American Federation of Government Employees - Positions 79%
2010 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 94%
2010 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 80%
2010 International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers - Positions 100%
2009-2010 Communications Workers of America - Positions 60%
2009-2010 International Brotherhood of Teamsters - Positions 77%
2009-2010 International Foodservice Distributors Association - Positions 10%
2009-2010 National Farmers Union - Positions 67%
2009-2010 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 72%
2009 American Federation of Government Employees - Positions 92%
2009 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 94%
2009 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Lifetime Score 86%
2009 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 91%
2009 International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers - Positions 80%
2009 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 100%
2009 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 75%
2009 Women Employed - Positions 100%
2008 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Lifetime Score 85%
2008 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 100%
2008 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 100%
2008 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Lifetime Score 92%
2008 Center for Worker Freedom - Positions 0%
2008 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 100%
2008 Latin America Working Group - Positions 33%
2008 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 75%
2008 Utility Workers Union of America - Positions 100%
2007-2008 International Foodservice Distributors Association - Positions 14%
2007-2008 National Farmers Union - Family Farm Advocacy Score 91
2007-2008 United Food & Commercial Workers - Positions 80%
2007 American Federation of Government Employees - Positions 100%
2007 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 84%
2007 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 86%
2007 Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers - Positions 100%
2007 Center for Worker Freedom - Positions 0%
2007 International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers - Positions 60%
2007 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 100
2007 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 66%
2007 United Auto Workers - Positions 92%
2007 Utility Workers Union of America - Positions 100
2006 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 73%
2006 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 88%
2006 International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers - Positions 75%
2006 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 60%
2006 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 88%
2006 Transportation Communications Union - Positions 75%
2006 United Auto Workers - Positions 77%
2005-2006 American Road and Transportation Builders Association - Positions 100%
2005-2006 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers - Positions 71%
2005-2006 National Farmers Union - Positions 66%
2005 American Federation of Government Employees - Positions 67%
2005 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 71%
2005 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 88%
2005 International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers - Positions 80%
2005 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 67%
2005 International Sleep Products Association - Positions 50%
2005 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 77%
2005 Transportation Communications Union - Positions 80%
2005 United Auto Workers - Positions 86%
2004 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 92%
2004 American Postal Workers Union - Positions 92%
2004 Communications Workers of America - Positions 100%
2004 International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers - Positions 100%
2004 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 83%
2004 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 100%
2004 Transportation Communications Union - Positions 83%
2004 United Auto Workers - Positions 82%
2003-2004 American Federation of Government Employees - Positions 100%
2003-2004 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 100%
2003-2004 American Road and Transportation Builders Association - Positions 88%
2003-2004 Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers - Positions 46%
2003-2004 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers - Positions 71%
2003-2004 National Farmers Union - Positions 89%
2003 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 85%
2003 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 100%
2003 Communications Workers of America - Positions 100%
2003 International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers - Positions 100%
2003 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 86%
2003 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers - Positions 73%
2003 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 100%
2003 Transportation Communications Union - Positions 100%
2003 United Auto Workers - Positions on Workplace Rights 100%
1999 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 85%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top