or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Mark Lunsford Pryor

Senator Mark Lunsford Pryor's Special Interest Group Ratings

Mark Lunsford Pryor
Full Name: Mark Lunsford Pryor
Current Office: U.S. Senate - Sr, Democratic
First Elected: 11/05/2002
Last Elected: 11/04/2008
Next Election: 2014

Foreign Affairs

2011 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score 64%
2011 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 40%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 50%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 53%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 53%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 47%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 47%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 49%
2010 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 50%
2010 Peace Action - Positions 79%
2010 Peace Action West - Positions 79%
2009-2010 ACT! for America - Positions 83%
2009-2010 Council for a Livable World - Positions 100%
2009-2010 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 50%
2009 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 40%
2009 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 60%
2009 Latin America Working Group - Positions 50%
2009 Peace Action West - Positions 50%
2009 Resolve Uganda - Lifetime Score 25%
2008 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 50%
2008 Peace Action West - Positions 60%
2007-2008 ACT! for America - Positions 100%
2007-2008 Council for a Livable World - Positions 50%
2007-2008 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 54%
2007 Council for a Livable World - Positions 54%
2007 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 63%
2007 Latin America Working Group - Positions 25%
2007 Peace Action West - Positions 18%
2007 Voices for Creative Nonviolence - Positions on Iraq War Amendments 75%
2006 Latin America Working Group - Positions 33%
2006 Peace Action - Positions 44%
2006 Peace Action West - Positions 44%
2005-2006 ACT! for America - Positions 58%
2005-2006 Council for a Livable World - Positions 66%
2005-2006 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 83%
2005-2006 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 66%
2005 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score B
2005 Latin America Working Group - Positions 50%
2005 Peace Action - Positions 56%
2005 PeacePAC - Positions 75%
2004 Armenian National Committee of America - Positions 38%
2004 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 50%
2004 Latin America Working Group - Positions 25%
2004 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 100%
2004 Peace Action - Positions 100%
2003-2004 ACT! for America - Positions 50%
2003-2004 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 75%
2003 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 78%
2003 Latin America Working Group - Positions 67%
2003 Peace Action - Positions 80%
2003 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -1
2001-2004 Council for a Livable World - Positions 89%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top