Senator Mark Lunsford Pryor's Special Interest Group Ratings

Office: U.S. Senate (AR) - Sr, Democratic
On The Ballot: Running, Democratic for U.S. Senate
Filter by Issue
How To Interpret These Evaluations

Marriage, Family, and Children

2014 FRC Action - Positions 11% 2014 Population Connection - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 67% 2013-2014 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 50% 2013-2014 Eagle Forum - Positions 0% 2013 Eagle Forum - Positions 0% 2013 Population Connection - Positions (Sept. 2013) 50% 2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 0% 2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 20% 2011 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 0% 2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 6% 2011 Family Research Council - Positions 0% 2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 42% 2009-2010 American Family Association - Positions 8% 2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 23% 2009-2010 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 20% 2009-2010 Family Research Council - Positions 4% 2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 14% 2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 17% 2009 Population Connection - Committee Votes Score 75% 2008 Eagle Forum - Positions 37% 2007-2008 American Family Association - Positions 0% 2007-2008 Campaign for Working Families - Positions on Conservative Issues 25 2007-2008 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 20% 2007-2008 Family Research Council - Positions 22% 2007-2008 Population Action International - Positions 100% 2007 American Academy of Family Physicians - Positions 100% 2007 Eagle Forum - Positions 47% 2007 Family Research Council - Positions 14 2007 League of Women Voters - Children's Health Issues Score 100% 2007 Population Connection - Positions on Population Stabilization 100% 2006 Eagle Forum - Positions 33% 2006 Family Research Council - Positions 25% 2006 Population Connection - Positions 75% 2005-2006 American Family Association - Positions 33% 2005-2006 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 32% 2005-2006 Population Action International - Positions on Reproductive Health 100% 2005 Eagle Forum - Positions 0% 2005 Population Connection - Positions 100% 2004 American Family Association - Positions 0% 2004 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 16% 2004 Eagle Forum - Positions 40% 2004 Family Research Council - Positions 33% 2003-2004 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 24% 2003-2004 National Parent Teacher Association - Positions 93% 2003-2004 Population Action International - Positions 100% 2003-2004 Population Connection - Positions 71% 2003 American Family Association - Positions 67% 2003 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 19% 2003 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 16% 2003 Eagle Forum - Positions 27% 2003 Family Research Council - Positions 43% 2003 Population Action International - Positions 100% 2003 Population Connection - Positions 67%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.