Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Mark Lunsford Pryor's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Environment

Office: U.S. Senate (AR) - Sr, Democratic
On The Ballot: Running, Democratic for U.S. Senate

Environment

2014 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score 37%
2013 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 25%
2013 Environment America - Positions 25%
2013 Food Policy Action - Positions 50%
2013 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 54%
2013 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 63%
2011-2012 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 100%
2011-2012 Environment America - Positions 100%
2011-2012 Food Policy Action - Positions 61%
2011 Environment America - Positions 72%
2011 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 63%
2011 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 82%
2010-2011 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 100%
2010 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 14%
2010 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 60%
2009-2010 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 67%
2009-2010 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 67%
2009-2010 National Parks Conservation Association - Positions 67%
2009 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 75%
2009 Environment America - Positions 100%
2009 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 100%
2008 Environment America - Positions 70%
2007-2008 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 64%
2007-2008 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 73%
2007 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 40%
2007 League of Conservation Voters - First Session Score 60%
2006-2012 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 67%
2006 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 43%
2005-2006 American Forest and Paper Association - Positions 71%
2005-2006 American Lands Alliance - Positions 0%
2005-2006 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 83%
2005-2006 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 55%
2005-2006 Partnership for America - Positions 60%
2005 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 75%
2005 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 60%
2005 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 66%
2004 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 50%
2003-2004 American Lands Alliance - Positions 11%
2003-2004 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 100%
2003-2004 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 48%
2003-2004 National Parks Conservation Association - Positions 60%
2003-2004 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 77%
2003 American Lands Alliance - Positions 0%
2003 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 55%
2003 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 42%
2003 Sierra Club - Positions 50%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top