Senator Mark Lunsford Pryor's Special Interest Group Ratings

Biographical

Full Name: Mark Lunsford Pryor
Current Office: U.S. Senate - Sr, Democratic
First Elected: 11/05/2002
Last Elected: 11/04/2008
Next Election: 2014
On The Ballot: Running, Democratic for U.S. Senate
General Nov. 4, 2014
Primary May 20, 2014
Gender: Male
Family: Wife: Jill; 2 Children: Adams, Porter
Birth Date: 01/10/1963
Birth Place: Fayetteville, AR
Home City: Little Rock, AR
Religion: Christian
Filter by Issue
How To Interpret These Evaluations

Abortion

2014 National Right to Life Committee - Positions (June 4, 2014) 66% 2013-2014 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 50% 2013 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 45% 2013 National Right to Life Committee - Positions (Jan. 14, 2014) 66% 2012 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100% 2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 20% 2011-2012 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 0% 2011 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100% 2011 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 0% 2010 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100% 2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 23% 2009-2010 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 14% 2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 14% 2009 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 55% 2009 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 16% 2008 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 60% 2007-2008 Campaign for Working Families - Positions on Conservative Issues 25 2007-2008 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 14% 2007 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100% 2006 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 45% 2005-2006 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 32% 2005-2006 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 50% 2005 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 75% 2004 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0% 2003-2004 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 24% 2003-2004 Democrats for Life of America - Positions 100% 2003-2004 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 64% 2003 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 19% 2003 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 29%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.