Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Kevin W. Yoder's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Business and Consumers

Office: U.S. House (KS) - District 3, Republican

Business and Consumers

2013-2014 Associated General Contractors of America - Lifetime Scores (Taxes) 67%
2013-2014 Associated General Contractors of America - Positions 72%
2013-2014 Associated General Contractors of America - Lifetime Scores (Labor) 100%
2013-2014 Associated General Contractors of America - Lifetime Scores (Environment) 100%
2013-2014 Associated General Contractors of America - Lifetime Scores (Infrastructure) 43%
2013-2014 Associated General Contractors of America - Lifetime Scores 74%
2013-2014 Associated General Contractors of America - Lifetime Scores (Other) 50%
2013-2014 International Warehouse Logistics Association - Positions 100%
2013-2014 Metals Service Center Institute - Positions 83
2013-2014 National Association of Manufacturers - Positions 100%
2013-2014 National Electrical Contractors Association - Positions (Interim Mid-Year) 66%
2013-2014 National Retail Federation - Positions: Healthcare (House Only) 100%
2013-2014 National Retail Federation - Positions: Labor 100%
2013-2014 National Retail Federation - Positions: Budget/Tax 100%
2013-2014 National Small Business Association - Positions 70
2013-2014 The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions 90
2013 National Electrical Contractors Association - Positions 42%
2013 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 100%
2013 The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions 100%
2013 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 85%
2013 United States Chamber of Commerce - Lifetime Score 90%
2012 National Association of Manufacturers - Positions of 112th Congress 92%
2012 National Electrical Contractors Association - Positions 50%
2012 United States Chamber of Commerce - Lifetime Score 93%
2012 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 92%
2011-2012 American Council of Engineering Companies - Positions 64
2011-2012 Independent Electrical Contractors - Positions (House) 100%
2011-2012 International Warehouse Logistics Association - Positions 100
2011-2012 National Association of Manufacturers - Positions 92%
2011-2012 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 100%
2011-2012 National Retail Federation - Positions: International Trade 100%
2011-2012 National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association - Positions 85%
2011-2012 Plumbing-Heating-Cooling Contractors-National Association - Positions 100%
2011-2012 Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council - Positions 100%
2011 National Electrical Contractors Association - Positions (House Only) 100%
2011 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 100%
2011 National Retail Federation - Positions 100%
2011 National Small Business Association - Positions 66%
2011 National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association - Positions 100%
2011 The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions 100%
2011 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 94%
2007-2008 Kansas National Federation of Independent Business - Positions on Pro-Small Business Policy 88
2005-2006 Kansas National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 88%
2004 Greater Kansas City Chamber of Commerce - Positions 90%
2004 Kansas Chamber of Commerce and Industry - Positions 92%
2003-2004 Kansas National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 50%
2003 Kansas Chamber of Commerce and Industry - Positions 80%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top