or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Mike Pence

Mike Pence's Ratings and Endorsements

Full Name: Mike Pence
Current Office: Governor, Republican
First Elected: 11/06/2012
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2016

Conservative

2012 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 99%
2012 American Conservative Union - Ratings of Congress 100%
2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Foreign) 84%
2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Composite Score) 93%
2012 The Club for Growth - Positions 78%
2012 The John Birch Society - Positions 66%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime score 97%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 95%
2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 96%
2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 80%
2011 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 99%
2011 American Conservative Union - Positions 92%
2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 96%
2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 61%
2011 Heritage Action for America - Positions (House Only) 100%
2011 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 91%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 85%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 14%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 67%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 68%
2011 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 68%
2010 American Conservative Union - Positions 100%
2010 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 100%
2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 75%
2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 88%
2009-2010 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 100%
2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 78%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2010 86%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 86%
2009 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 100%
2009 American Conservative Union - Positions 100%
2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2009 ConservAmerica - Positions 3
2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 75%
2009 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 93%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2009) 90%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 89%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 89%
2008 American Conservative Union - Positions 100%
2008 Eagle Forum - Positions 88%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 84%
2008 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 92.7%
2007-2009 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 66%
2007-2008 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 100%
2007-2008 Campaign for Working Families - Positions on Conservative Issues 100
2007-2008 Concerned Women for America - Positions 95%
2007-2008 ConservAmerica - Positions 0
2007-2008 The John Birch Society - Positions 66%
2007 American Conservative Union - Positions 96%
2007 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 100%
2007 ConservAmerica - Positions 0
2007 Eagle Forum - Positions 94%
2007 GOPUSA - Positions 19%
2007 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 85.3%
2007 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 72%
2007 The John Birch Society - Conservative Index Score 80%
2006 American Conservative Union - Positions 100%
2006 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 100%
2006 ConservAmerica - Positions 17
2006 Eagle Forum - Positions 71%
2006 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 81.7%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 94%
2006 The John Birch Society - Positions 43%
2005-2006 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2005-2006 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2005 American Conservative Union - Positions 100%
2005 ConservAmerica - Positions 8
2005 Eagle Forum - Positions 80%
2005 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 89%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 84%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 97%
2005 The John Birch Society - Positions 13%
2004 American Conservative Union - Positions 100%
2004 Christian Action Network - Lifetime Score 98%
2004 Eagle Forum - Positions 97%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 93%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring) 38%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Fall) 50%
2003-2004 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2003-2004 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2003 American Conservative Union - Positions 100%
2003 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2003 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2003 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 80%
2003 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 80%
2003 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer) 38%
2002 American Conservative Union - Positions 100%
2002 Eagle Forum - Positions 93%
2002 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 85%
2002 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 87%
2002 The John Birch Society - Positions 56%
2001-2010 Keep America Safe - Positions 100%
2001-2002 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 97%
2001-2002 Concerned Women for America - Positions 93%
2001 American Conservative Union - Positions 100%
2001 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 97%
2001 The John Birch Society - Positions 89%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top