Search Form
Now choose a category »
 

Daniel William Lipinski's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Abortion and Reproductive

Office: U.S. House (IL) - District 3, Democratic
On The Ballot: Running, Democratic for U.S. House - District 3

Abortion and Reproductive

2014 Planned Parenthood Action Fund - Positions (June 27, 2014) 15%
2014 Planned Parenthood Action Fund - Positions (June 27, 2014) 0%
2014 Planned Parenthood Action Fund - Positions captured January 9, 2014 (reflect past 6 years' voting record) 0%
2014 Population Connection - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 67%
2013 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 20%
2013 Planned Parenthood Action Fund - Positions captured February, 2013 (reflect voting records of past 6 years) 17%
2013 Population Connection - Positions (Sept. 2013) 33%
2012 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2012 Planned Parenthood Action Fund - Positions captured June, 2012 (reflect voting records of past 6 years) 17%
2011 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 10%
2010 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2010 Planned Parenthood Action Fund - Positions 14%
2009-2010 National Family Planning & Reproductive Health Association - House of Representatives Score 0%
2009 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2009 Population Connection - Committee Votes Score 0%
2008 Planned Parenthood Action Fund - Positions 20%
2007-2008 National Family Planning & Reproductive Health Association - Positions 0%
2007-2008 National Organization for Women - Positions 75%
2007-2008 Population Action International - Positions 100%
2007 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2007 Population Connection - Positions on Population Stabilization 50%
2006 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2006 Planned Parenthood Action Fund - Positions 0%
2006 Population Connection - Positions 43%
2005-2006 National Family Planning & Reproductive Health Association - Positions 50%
2005-2006 National Organization for Women - Positions 62%
2005-2006 Population Action International - Positions on Reproductive Health 0%
2005 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2005 National Organization for Women - Positions 86%
2005 Population Connection - Positions 33%
2005 The Population Institute - Positions 50%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top