or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Daniel William Lipinski

Representative Daniel William Lipinski's Special Interest Group Ratings

Daniel William Lipinski
Full Name: Daniel William Lipinski
Current Office: U.S. House - District 3, Democratic
First Elected: 11/02/2004
Last Elected: 11/06/2012

Civil Liberties and Civil Rights

2012 Open Doors USA - Positions 75%
2011-2012 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 15%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Liberal Action Score 44%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 53%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Conservative Action Score 38%
2011 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions (House Only) 20%
2009-2010 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 50%
2009-2010 Arab American Institute - Positions 0%
2009-2010 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 40%
2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 29%
2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Action Score 22
2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 54%
2009-2010 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 94%
2009-2010 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 83%
2009 American Library Association - Positions 13%
2009 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 28%
2009 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Action Score 19%
2009 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 84%
2008 American Library Association - Positions 0%
2007-2008 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 82%
2007-2008 Arab American Institute - Positions on Arab American Issues 33%
2007-2008 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 45%
2007-2008 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 48%
2007-2008 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Oath of Office Score 20%
2007-2008 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions on Civil and Human 91
2007-2008 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions on Civil Rights and Social Justice Issues 93%
2007-2008 The American Hellenic Educational Progressive Association - Greek American Issues Score 55%
2007 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 83
2007 American Library Association - Positions 10%
2007 Arab American Institute - Positions on Arab American Issues 40%
2007 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 80%
2007 League of Women Voters - Civil Liberties and Civil Rights Score 50%
2007 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 92%
2007 National Council of La Raza - Positions 100
2006 Association of Community Organization for Reform Now (ACORN) - Positions 78%
2006 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 74%
2005-2006 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 52%
2005-2006 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 40%
2005-2006 Iranian American Political Action Committee - Positions 50%
2005-2006 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Conservative Action Score 14%
2005-2006 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 89%
2005 Arab American Institute - Positions 1%
2005 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 78%
2005 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 87%
2005 National Council of La Raza - Positions 66%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top