or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

[x] close
Print Track This Candidate

Kay Granger

Representative Kay Granger's Special Interest Group Ratings

Kay Granger
Full Name: Kay Granger
Current Office: U.S. House - District 12, Republican
First Elected: 11/05/1996
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2014

Filter by Issue:

Budget, Spending and Taxes

2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 43%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 54%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 0%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 77%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 100%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 23%
2011 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 71%
2010 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 93%
2010 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 92%
2009 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 46%
2009 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 85%
2008 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 78%
2008 Citizens Against Government Waste - Lifetime Score 63%
2007-2008 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 92%
2007 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 90%
2007 FreedomWorks - Positions 95%
2006 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 82%
2006 FreedomWorks - Positions 58%
2006 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 57%
2005-2006 Citizens for Tax Justice - Positions 0%
2005-2006 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 74%
2005 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 96%
2005 FreedomWorks - Positions 71%
2005 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 56%
2005 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 0%
2004 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 90%
2004 American Shareholders Association - Positions 90%
2004 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 54%
2004 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 12%
2003-2004 FreedomWorks - Positions 64%
2003-2004 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 78%
2003 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 90%
2003 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 60%
2003 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 20%
2002 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 100%
2002 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 53%
2002 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 17%
2001-2002 Concord Coalition - Positions 14%
2001-2002 FreedomWorks - Positions 85%
2001-2002 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 78%
2001 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 95%
2001 American Shareholders Association - Positions 100%
2001 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 63%
2001 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 23%
2000 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 95%
2000 Concord Coalition - Positions 39%
2000 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 21%
1999-2000 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 72%
1999 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 80%
1999 Concord Coalition - Positions 28%
1999 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 53%
1998 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 95%
1998 Concord Coalition - Positions 16%
1998 National Taxpayers Union - Spending Score 49%
1998 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 12%
1997-1998 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 89%
1997 Concord Coalition - Positions 58%
1997 National Taxpayers Union - Spending Score 51%
1997 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 19%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

About Project Vote Smart

Help Us If You Can

Media & Communications

Education

For Candidates

One Common Ground, Philipsburg, MT 59858 Hotline: 888-Vote-Smart (888-868-3762)
All content © 1992 - 2013 Project Vote Smart unless otherwise attributed - Privacy Policy - Legislative demographic data provided by Aristotle International, Inc. Mobile Version

Back to top