or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

James 'Jim' Marshall

James 'Jim' Marshall's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Women

Full Name: James 'Jim' Marshall

Women

2010 Federally Employed Women - Positions 60%
2010 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2009-2010 American Association of University Women - Positions 64%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 78%
2009 American Association of University Women - Positions 67%
2009 Federally Employed Women - Positions 90%
2009 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2009 Women Employed - Positions 50%
2007-2008 American Association of University Women - Positions 90%
2007-2008 Concerned Women for America - Positions 95%
2007-2008 Federally Employed Women - Equality in Government Score 70
2007-2008 National Organization for Women - Positions 67%
2007 American Association of University Women - Positions 83
2007 Federally Employed Women - Positions 70%
2007 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2006 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2006 United States Women's Chamber of Commerce - Positions 100%
2006 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 50%
2005-2006 American Association of University Women - Positions 60%
2005-2006 Business and Professional Women USA - Positions 100%
2005-2006 Concerned Women for America - Positions 93%
2005-2006 Federally Employed Women - Positions 60%
2005-2006 National Organization for Women - Positions 50%
2005 American Association of University Women - Positions 67%
2005 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2005 National Organization for Women - Positions 71%
2004 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2004 United States Women's Chamber of Commerce - Positions 50%
2003-2004 American Association of University Women - Positions 50%
2003-2004 Business and Professional Women USA - Positions 77%
2003-2004 Concerned Women for America - Positions 77%
2003-2004 Federally Employed Women - Positions 70%
2003-2004 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 53%
2003 American Association of University Women - Positions 60%
2003 American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists - Positions 0%
2003 Business and Professional Women USA - Positions 71%
2003 Concerned Women for America - Positions 69%
2003 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 10%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top