Search Form
Now choose a category »
 

James 'Jim' Marshall's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Environment

Environment

2010 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 57%
2010 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 50%
2009-2010 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 57%
2009-2010 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 54%
2009-2010 Southern Alliance for Clean Energy Action Fund - Positions 20%
2009 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 60%
2009 Environment America - Positions 80%
2009 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 57%
2008 Environment America - Positions 62%
2008 Southern Alliance for Clean Energy Action Fund - Positions 86%
2007-2008 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 50%
2007-2008 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 61%
2007 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 40%
2007 League of Conservation Voters - First Session Score 55%
2007 Southern Alliance for Clean Energy Action Fund - Positions 50%
2006-2012 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 50%
2006 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 42%
2006 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 50%
2005-2006 American Forest and Paper Association - Positions 75%
2005-2006 American Lands Alliance - Positions 11%
2005-2006 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 100%
2005-2006 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 50%
2005-2006 Partnership for America - Positions 50%
2005 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 100%
2005 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 61%
2004 Center for International Policy - Positions 100%
2004 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 60%
2003-2004 American Lands Alliance - Positions 30%
2003-2004 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 64%
2003-2004 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 58%
2003-2004 National Parks Conservation Association - Positions 67%
2003-2004 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 53%
2003 American Lands Alliance - Positions 38%
2003 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 53%
2003 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 55%
2003 Sierra Club - Positions 75%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top