Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

James 'Jim' Marshall's Ratings and Endorsements

Conservative

2010 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 45%
2010 American Conservative Union - Positions 48%
2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 66%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 55%
2010 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 58%
2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 40%
2009-2010 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 55%
2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 63%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 78%
2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 41%
2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Action Score 37
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 30%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2010 40%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 40%
2009 American Conservative Union - Positions 32%
2009 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 45%
2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 63%
2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 50%
2009 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Action Score 29%
2009 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 59%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 61%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2009) 40%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 50%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 45%
2008 American Conservative Union - Positions 28%
2008 Eagle Forum - Positions 55%
2008 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 55%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 57%
2007-2008 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 29%
2007-2008 Campaign for Working Families - Positions on Conservative Issues 87
2007-2008 Concerned Women for America - Positions 95%
2007-2008 The John Birch Society - Positions 31%
2007 American Conservative Union - Positions 61%
2007 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 18%
2007 Eagle Forum - Positions 85%
2007 GOPUSA - Positions 14%
2007 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 58%
2007 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 56.5%
2007 The John Birch Society - Conservative Index Score 44%
2006 American Conservative Union - Positions 72%
2006 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 5%
2006 Eagle Forum - Positions 43%
2006 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 50%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 54%
2006 The John Birch Society - Positions 24%
2005-2006 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 86%
2005-2006 Concerned Women for America - Positions 93%
2005-2006 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Conservative Action Score 29%
2005 American Conservative Union - Positions 46%
2005 Eagle Forum - Positions 80%
2005 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 49%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 44%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 48%
2005 The John Birch Society - Positions 25%
2004 American Conservative Union - Positions 48%
2004 Christian Action Network - Lifetime Score 77%
2004 Eagle Forum - Positions 64%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 46%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring) 13%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Fall) 50%
2003-2004 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 73%
2003-2004 Concerned Women for America - Positions 77%
2003 American Conservative Union - Positions 24%
2003 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 68%
2003 Concerned Women for America - Positions 69%
2003 Eagle Forum - Positions 46%
2003 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 45%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 43%
2003 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer) 38%
2001-2010 Keep America Safe - Positions 84%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top