Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

John Barrow's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Animals and Wildlife

Animals and Wildlife

2014 Food Policy Action - Positions 44%
2014 Goldwater Institute - Positions 17%
2014 Sportsmen's and Animal Owners' Voting Alliance - Positions 100%
2013-2014 Food Policy Action - Positions 44%
2013-2014 Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 17%
2013 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 33%
2013 Food Policy Action - Positions 54%
2013 Goldwater Institute - Positions 11%
2012 Sierra Club - Positions on Clean water (House Only) 43%
2012 Sportsmen's and Animal Owners' Voting Alliance - Positions 100%
2011-2012 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 50%
2011-2012 Food Policy Action - Positions 57%
2011-2012 Goldwater Institute - Positions 9%
2011 American Veterinary Medical Association - Positions on Professional Advocacy 100%
2011 Goldwater Institute - Positions 13%
2011 Sierra Club - Positions on Clean Water (House Only) 50%
2010-2011 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 65%
2010 Sportsmen's and Animal Owners' Voting Alliance - Positions 100%
2009-2010 Animal Welfare Institute - U.S. House Score 50%
2009-2010 Big Cat Rescue - House of Representatives Score 66%
2009-2010 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 86%
2009-2010 Goldwater Institute - Positions 47%
2009-2010 Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 47%
2009 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 80%
2009 Goldwater Institute - Positions 38%
2008 Sportsmen's and Animal Owners' Voting Alliance - Positions 100
2007-2008 Animal Welfare Institute - U.S. House Score 33%
2007-2008 Big Cat Rescue - Positions 66
2007-2008 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 44%
2007-2008 Goldwater Institute - Positions on Animal Protection 42%
2007-2008 Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 42%
2007 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 30%
2007 Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions on Animal Protection 17%
2006 National Animal Interest Alliance Trust - Positions 100%
2006 Sportsmen's and Animal Owners' Voting Alliance - Positions 100%
2005-2006 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 100%
2005-2006 Animal Welfare Institute - U.S. House Score 0%
2005-2006 Big Cat Rescue - Positions 86%
2005-2006 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 56%
2005-2006 Goldwater Institute - Positions 14%
2005-2006 Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 14%
2005 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 100%
2005 Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 17%
2004 Sportsmen's and Animal Owners' Voting Alliance - Positions 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top