Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

John Barrow's Ratings and Endorsements

Conservative

2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score (June 23, 2014) 32%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (Jan. 7, 2014) 30%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score 33%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (June 23, 2014) 25%
2014 Conservative Review - Positions 28
2014 Heritage Action for America - Positions (113th Congress) 28%
2014 Heritage Action for America - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 30%
2014 The John Birch Society - Positions 45%
2014 The John Birch Society - Lifetime Score 31%
2013-2014 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 53%
2013-2014 Eagle Forum - Positions 14%
2013-2014 Faith and Freedom Coalition - Positions 45
2013-2014 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Conservative Action Score 33
2013-2014 The John Birch Society - Positions (113th Congress, full session) 48%
2013 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 34%
2013 American Conservative Union - Positions 28%
2013 Concerned Women for America - Positions 53%
2013 Eagle Forum - Positions 0%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy 52%
2013 National Journal - Conservative (Composite) 48%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy 46%
2013 The John Birch Society - Positions 50%
2012 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 35%
2012 American Conservative Union - Ratings of Congress 60%
2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 25%
2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Foreign) 46%
2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Composite Score) 45%
2012 The Club for Growth - Positions 51%
2012 The John Birch Society - Positions 40%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime score 26%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 36%
2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 47%
2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 20%
2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 26%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Conservative Action Score 47%
2011 American Conservative Union - Positions 20%
2011 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 31%
2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 18%
2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 38%
2011 Heritage Action for America - Positions (House Only) 33%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 42%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 57%
2011 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 43%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 35%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 30%
2010 American Conservative Union - Positions 17%
2010 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 33%
2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 33%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 49%
2010 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 51%
2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 10%
2009-2010 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 42%
2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 50%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 30%
2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 54%
2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Action Score 19
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 20%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 23%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2010 27%
2009 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 36%
2009 American Conservative Union - Positions 17%
2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 45%
2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 18%
2009 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Action Score 19%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 57%
2009 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 53%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2009) 30%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 30%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 30%
2008 American Conservative Union - Positions 24%
2008 Eagle Forum - Positions 33%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 51%
2008 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 51.8%
2007-2008 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 29%
2007-2008 Campaign for Working Families - Positions on Conservative Issues 50
2007-2008 Concerned Women for America - Positions 38%
2007-2008 The John Birch Society - Positions 25%
2007 American Conservative Union - Positions 24%
2007 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 36%
2007 Eagle Forum - Positions 58%
2007 GOPUSA - Positions 3%
2007 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 54.2%
2007 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 55%
2007 The John Birch Society - Conservative Index Score 30%
2006 American Conservative Union - Positions 76%
2006 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 0%
2006 Eagle Forum - Positions 43%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 47%
2006 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 48.2%
2006 The John Birch Society - Positions 27%
2005-2006 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 76%
2005-2006 Concerned Women for America - Positions 64%
2005-2006 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Conservative Action Score 14%
2005 American Conservative Union - Positions 40%
2005 Eagle Forum - Positions 57%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 38%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 47%
2005 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 44%
2001-2010 Keep America Safe - Positions 80%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top