Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Pam Roach's Ratings and Endorsements

Office: State Senate (WA) - District 31, Republican

Business and Consumers

2014 Association of Washington Business - Lifetime Score 84%
2014 Association of Washington Business - Positions 92%
2014 Association of Washington Business - Labor Score 13%
2013-2014 Washington National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 100%
2013 Association of Washington Business - Positions 95%
2013 Association of Washington Business - Lifetime Score 84%
2013 Association of Washington Business - Labor Score 39%
2012 Association of Washington Business - Positions 87%
2011-2012 Washington National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 89%
2011 Association of Washington Business - Positions 79%
2010 Association of Washington Business - Lifetime Score 83%
2010 Association of Washington Business - Positions 96%
2009-2010 Washington National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 78%
2009 Association of Washington Business - Positions 83%
2008 Association of Washington Business - Positions on Pro-Business Policy 91
2007-2008 Washington National Federation of Independent Business - Positions on Pro-Small Business Policy 100
2007 Association of Washington Business - Positions on Pro-Business Policy 70
2007 Building Industry Association of Washington - Housing Industry Advocacy Score 70
2006 Association of Washington Business - Positions 88%
2005-2006 Washington National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 88%
2005 Association of Washington Business - Positions 74%
2005 Building Industry Association of Washington - Positions 67%
2004 Association of Washington Business - Positions 85%
2003-2004 Washington National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 92%
2003 Association of Washington Business - Positions 95%
2002 Association of Washington Business - Positions 75%
2001-2002 Washington National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 73%
2001 Association of Washington Business - State Senate Score 88%
1999-2000 Washington National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 73%
1997-1998 Washington National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 100%

Federal, State and Local Relations

2014 Municipal League of King County - Positions 50%

Labor Unions

2014 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 13%
2014 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Lifetime Scores 38%
2013 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 8%
2013 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Lifetime Score 39%
2012 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Lifetime Scores 40%
2012 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 50%
2011 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Postions 53%
2011 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Lifetime Scores 40%
2010 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 43%
2010 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Lifetime Score 39%
2008 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions on Workplace Rights 40
2007 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions on Workplace Rights 83
2006 Washington Public Employees Association - Positions 100%
2006 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 75%
2005 Washington Public Employees Association - Positions 40%
2005 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 40%
2004 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 18%
2003-2004 Washington Public Employees Association - Positions 45%
2003 Washington Public Employees Association - Positions 40%
2003 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 21%
2002 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 42%
2001 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 13%
1998 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 0%
1997 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 20%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top