Search Form
Now choose a category »
 

Ander Crenshaw's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Animals and Wildlife

Office: U.S. House (FL) - District 4, Republican
On The Ballot: Running, Republican for U.S. House - District 4

Animals and Wildlife

2014 American Veterinary Medical Assoctiation - Positions on Professional Advocacy 100%
2013 American Veterinary Medical Assoctiation - Positions on Professional Advocacy 0%
2013 Animal Welfare Institute - Compassion Index 0%
2013 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 20%
2013 Food Policy Action - Positions 31%
2013 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 11%
2012 Sierra Club - Positions on Clean water (House Only) 0%
2012 Sportsmen and Animal Owner's Voting Alliance - Positions 100%
2011-2012 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 6%
2011-2012 Food Policy Action - Positions 36%
2011-2012 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 0%
2011 American Veterinary Medical Assoctiation - Positions on Professional Advocacy 50%
2011 Sierra Club - Positions on Clean Water (House Only) 0%
2011 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 0%
2010-2011 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 10%
2010 Sportsmen and Animal Owner's Voting Alliance - Positions 80%
2009-2010 Animal Welfare Institute - U.S. House Score 50%
2009-2010 Big Cat Rescue - House of Representatives Score 33%
2009-2010 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 33%
2009-2010 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 33%
2009 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 25%
2009 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 23%
2008 Sportsmen and Animal Owner's Voting Alliance - Positions 0
2007-2008 Animal Welfare Institute - U.S. House Score 33%
2007-2008 Big Cat Rescue - Positions 100
2007-2008 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 14%
2007-2008 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions on Animal Protection 33%
2007-2008 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 33
2007 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 10%
2007 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions on Animal Protection 67
2006 National Animal Interest Alliance Trust - Positions 0%
2006 Sportsmen and Animal Owner's Voting Alliance - Positions 100%
2005-2006 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 0%
2005-2006 Animal Welfare Institute - U.S. House Score 100%
2005-2006 Big Cat Rescue - Positions 38%
2005-2006 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 10%
2005-2006 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 42
2005-2006 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 42%
2005 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 0%
2005 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 0%
2004 American Humane Association - Positions 11%
2004 American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals - Positions 11%
2004 Born Free USA - Positions 11%
2004 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 0%
2004 Sportsmen and Animal Owner's Voting Alliance - Positions 100%
2004 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 11
2004 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 11
2003-2004 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 0%
2003 American Humane Association - Positions 11%
2003 American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals - Positions 11%
2003 Animal Welfare Institute - Positions 11%
2003 Born Free USA - Positions 11%
2003 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 7%
2003 Doris Day Animal League - Positions 11%
2003 Sierra Club - Positions 0%
2003 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 11%
2003 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 11%
2001-2002 American Humane Association - Positions 0%
2001-2002 American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals - Positions 0%
2001-2002 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 0%
2001-2002 Animal Welfare Institute - Positions 0%
2001-2002 Born Free USA - Positions 0%
2001-2002 Doris Day Animal League - Positions 0%
2001-2002 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 0%
2001-2002 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top