| Full Name: | John Huppenthal |
|---|---|
| Current Office: | Superintendent of Public Instruction, Republican |
| First Elected: | 11/02/2010 |
| Last Elected: | 11/02/2010 |
| Next Election: | 2014 |
John Huppenthal
Superintendent John Huppenthal's Special Interest Group Ratings
Filter by Issue:
- down
- Abortion
- Abortion and Reproductive
- Agriculture and Food
- Animals and Wildlife
- Arts and Entertainment
- Budget, Spending and Taxes
- Business and Consumers
- Campaign Finance and Elections
- Civil Liberties and Civil Rights
- Conservative
- Crime
- Death Penalty
- Defense
- Drugs
- Education
- Employment and Affirmative Action
- Energy
- Environment
- Executive Branch
- Federal, State and Local Relations
- Foreign Affairs
- Gambling and Gaming
- Government Operations
- Guns
- Health and Health Care
- Housing and Property
- Immigration
- Indigenous Peoples
- Judicial Branch
- Labor Unions
- Legislative Branch
- Liberal
- Marriage, Family, and Children
- Military Personnel
- National Security
- Science
- Senior Citizens
- Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity
- Social
- Stem Cell Research
- Technology and Communication
- Trade
- Transportation
- Unemployed and Low-Income
- Veterans
- Women
Abortion
Agriculture and Food
| 2003-2004 | Arizona Cattlemen's Association - Positions on Cattle Industry Policy | A |
Animals and Wildlife
Budget, Spending and Taxes
Business and Consumers
Conservative
| 2010 | Goldwater Institute - Education Score | 94% |
| 2010 | Goldwater Institute - Constitutional Government Score | 70% |
| 2010 | Goldwater Institute - Regulation Score | 48% |
| 2010 | Goldwater Institute - Tax and Budget Score | 63% |
| 2010 | Goldwater Institute - Total Score | 64% |
| 2009 | Goldwater Institute - Constitutional Government Score | 60% |
| 2009 | Goldwater Institute - Tax and Budget Score | 74% |
| 2009 | Goldwater Institute - Regulation Score | 44% |
| 2009 | Goldwater Institute - Education Score | 92% |
| 2009 | Goldwater Institute - Total Score | 62% |
| 2008 | Goldwater Institute - Constitutional Government Score | 62% |
| 2008 | Goldwater Institute - Education Score | 56% |
| 2008 | Goldwater Institute - Positions on Conservative Issues | 52 |
| 2008 | Goldwater Institute - Regulation Score | 41% |
| 2008 | Goldwater Institute - Tax and Budget Score | 52% |
| 2007 | Goldwater Institute - Positions | 50% |
| 2006 | Goldwater Institute - Positions | 58% |
| 2005 | Goldwater Institute - Positions | 65% |
| 2004 | Goldwater Institute - Positions | 63% |
| 2003 | Goldwater Institute - Positions | 59% |
Education
| 2009-2010 | Arizona Students' Association - Positions | 91% |
| 2006 | Arizona Education Association - Positions | 0% |
| 2005 | Arizona Education Association - Positions | 14% |
| 1997-1998 | Arizona Education Association - Positions | 25% |
Environment
Guns
Health and Health Care
Marriage, Family, and Children
Social
How to Interpret these Evaluations
Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.
Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.
Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.
