Representative Greg P. Walden's Special Interest Group Ratings

Biographical

Full Name: Greg P. Walden
Current Office: U.S. House - District 2, Republican
First Elected: 11/03/1998
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2014
Gender: Male
Family: Wife: Mylene; 1 Child: Anthony
Birth Date: 01/10/1957
Birth Place: The Dalles, OR
Home City: Hood River, OR
Religion: Episcopalian
Filter by Issue
How To Interpret These Evaluations

Social

2012 Catholic Advocate - Positions 100% 2012 Family Research Council - Positions 83% 2012 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 16% 2011 Family Research Council - Positions 90% 2011 Secular Coalition for America - Positions 14% 2010 Liberty Central - Positions on Conservative Issues B 2010 National Association of Social Workers - House of Representatives Score 0% 2009-2010 Family Research Council - Positions 75% 2009-2010 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 0% 2009 National Association of Social Workers - Positions 22% 2009 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 16% 2009 Population Connection - Committee Votes Score 33% 2008-2011 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 86% 2008 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions on Middle Class Advocacy 40 2008 National Association of Social Workers - Positions 20% 2008 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 45% 2007-2010 National Latino Congreso/William C. Velásquez Institute - Positions 0% 2007-2008 Population Action International - Positions 0% 2007 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions on Middle Class Advocacy 50 2007 National Association of Social Workers - Positions 66% 2007 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions on Social Justice and Peace 35 2007 Population Connection - Positions on Population Stabilization 50% 2006 National Association of Social Workers - Positions on Professional Advocacy 60 2006 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 40% 2006 Population Connection - Positions 29% 2006 Secular Coalition for America - Positions 20% 2005-2006 Population Action International - Positions on Reproductive Health 50% 2005 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 0% 2005 Hope for Peace and Justice - Positions 0 2005 National Association of Social Workers - Positions on Professional Advocacy 25 2005 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 0% 2005 Population Connection - Positions 33% 2005 The Population Institute - Positions 50% 2004 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 0% 2004 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 25% 2003-2004 Population Action International - Positions 100% 2003-2004 Population Connection - Positions 71% 2003 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 33% 2003 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 17% 2003 Population Action International - Positions 100% 2003 Population Connection - Positions 60% 2003 The Population Institute - Positions 100% 2002 Californians for Population Stabilization - Positions 67% 2002 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 0% 2002 Population Connection - Positions 33% 2001-2002 National Association of Social Workers - Positions 12% 2001 Californians for Population Stabilization - Positions 50% 2001 National Youth Advocacy Coalition - Positions 0% 2001 Population Connection - Positions 30% 2000 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 17% 2000 Population Connection - Positions 45% 1999-2000 National Association of Social Workers - Positions 0% 1999 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 18% 1999 Population Connection - Positions 44%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.