or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Doug LaMalfa

Doug LaMalfa's Ratings and Endorsements

Full Name: Doug LaMalfa
Current Office: U.S. House - District 1, Republican
First Elected: 11/06/2012
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2014
On The Ballot: Running, Republican for U.S. House - District 1
Primary June 3, 2014

Business and Consumers

2014 Population Connection - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 0%
2013 Food Policy Action - Positions 8%
2013 International Foodservice Distributors Association - Positions 100%
2013 National Electrical Contractors Association - Positions 63%
2013 The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions 100%
2012 California Chamber of Commerce - Positions 100%
2012 California Manufacturers and Technology Association - Positions 92%
2012 California National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 100%
2012 Consumer Federation of California - Positions on Consumer Issues 11%
2012 Consumer Federation of California - Lifetime Score 11%
2011 California Chamber of Commerce - Positions 100%
2011 California Manufacturers and Technology Association - Positions 91%
2011 California National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 100%
2011 Consumer Federation of California - Lifetime Score 11%
2011 Consumer Federation of California - Positions 10%
2008 California Chamber of Commerce - Positions on Pro-Business Policy 100%
2008 California Manufacturers and Technology Association - Positions on Manufacturers Advocacy 91
2007 California Chamber of Commerce - Positions on Pro-Business Policy 100
2007 California Manufacturers and Technology Association - Positions on Manufacturers Advocacy 89
2007 California Public Interest Research Group - Positions on Public Interest Advocacy 20
2007 Consumer Federation of California - Positions 10%
2006 California Chamber of Commerce - Positions on Pro-Business Policy 94%
2006 California Manufacturers and Technology Association - Positions on Manufacturers Advocacy 100
2006 California National Federation of Independent Business - Positions on Pro-Small Business Policy 100
2006 California Public Interest Research Group - Positions on Public Interest Advocacy 20
2006 Consumer Federation of California - Positions on Consumer Advocacy 8
2005-2006 California Manufacturers and Technology Association - Positions 100%
2005 California Chamber of Commerce - Positions 100%
2005 California Public Interest Research Group - Positions 12%
2004 California Chamber of Commerce - Positions 100%
2004 California Public Interest Research Group - Positions 27%
2003-2004 California Manufacturers and Technology Association - Positions 100%
2003-2004 California National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 100%
2003 California Chamber of Commerce - Positions 100%
2003 California Public Interest Research Group - Positions 21%

Civil Liberties and Civil Rights

2014 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions (captured January 3, 2014) 0%
2013 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 43%
2013 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 0%
2011 California Communities United Institute - Positions 37
2011 Republican Liberty Caucus of California - Economic Liberties Score 77%
2011 Republican Liberty Caucus of California - Overall Score 78%
2011 Republican Liberty Caucus of California - Civil Liberties Score 80%
2007 Applied Research Center - Positions on Racial Justice 9
2007 Asian Americans for Civil Rights and Equality - Positions on Civil Rights & Equality 15
2007 California Communities United Institute - Positions 24
2007 California Communities United Institute - LGBTI - LGBTI Rights Score 14
2007 Equality California - Positions on LGBT Rights 0
2007 Lambda Letters Project - Economic Policy Score 22
2007 Lambda Letters Project - Minority Rights Policy Score 38
2007 Lambda Letters Project - Women's Issues Score 14
2006 Applied Research Center - Positions on Racial Justice 20
2006 Asian Americans for Civil Rights and Equality - Positions on Civil Rights & Equality 7%
2006 California Communities United Institute - Positions on Underrepresented Group Issues 16
2006 California Communities United Institute - LGBTI - LGBTI Rights Score 0
2006 Lambda Letters Project - Minority Rights Policy Score 0
2006 Lambda Letters Project - Economic Policy Score 0
2006 Lambda Letters Project - Women's Issues Score 46
2006 Lambda Letters Project - HIV/AIDS Policy Score 33
2005-2006 Equality California - Positions on LGBT Rights 0
2005 Applied Research Center - Positions on Racial Justice 19
2005 Asian Americans for Civil Rights and Equality - Positions 23%
2005 California Communities United Institute - LGBTI - Positions 8%
2005 Equality California - Positions 7%
2005 Lambda Letters Project - Women's Issues Score 38%
2005 Lambda Letters Project - HIV/AIDS Policy Score 0%
2005 Lambda Letters Project - Minority Rights Policy Score 12%
2004 Applied Research Center - Positions 10%
2004 Asian Americans for Civil Rights and Equality - Positions 54%
2004 California Communities United Institute - LGBTI - Positions 0%
2004 Lambda Letters Project - Women's Issues Score 23%
2004 Lambda Letters Project - Minority Rights Policy Score 8%
2004 Lambda Letters Project - HIV/AIDS Policy Score 0%
2003 Asian Americans for Civil Rights and Equality - Positions 43%
2003 California Communities United Institute - Positions 20%
2003 Equality California - Positions 6%
1997-2003 Gay Rights Information - Positions on LGBT Rights 0%

Conservative

2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score 80%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score 80%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (Jan. 7, 2014) 80%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (Jan. 7, 2014) 80%
2014 Heritage Action for America - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 67%
2014 Heritage Action for America - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 67%
2014 Heritage Action for America - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 67%
2013 Competitive Enterprise Institute - Workplace Choice (August, 2013) 100%
2013 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2013 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2013 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2013 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2013 FreedomWorks - Positions 71%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy 77%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy 80%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy 87%
2013 National Journal - Conservative (Composite) 85%
2013 National Right to Life Committee - Positions (Jan. 14, 2014) 100%
2013 The Club for Growth - Positions 67%
2013 The Club for Growth - Positions (lifetime) 67%
2013 The John Birch Society - Positions 70%
2013 The John Birch Society - Positions 70%
2013 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 65
2012 American Conservative Union (California State Legislature) - Positions 96%
2012 American Conservative Union (California State Legislature) - Positions 96%
2012 California Republican Assembly - Positions 97%
2012 Capitol Resource Institute - Positions 100%
2011 California Republican Assembly - Positions 89%
2011 Capitol Resource Institute - Positions 100%
2011 Republican Liberty Caucus of California - Economic Liberties Score 77%
2011 Republican Liberty Caucus of California - Overall Score 78%
2011 Republican Liberty Caucus of California - Civil Liberties Score 80%
2007 California Republican Assembly - Positions on Republican Principles 95
2006 California Republican Assembly - Positions on Republican Principles 100
2005 California Republican Assembly - Positions 89%
2004 California Republican Assembly - Positions 95%
2003 California Republican Assembly - Positions 95%
2002 Christian Coalition of California - Positions 100%

Environment

2013 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 17%
2013 Environment America - Positions 0%
2013 Food Policy Action - Positions 8%
2013 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 0%
2013 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 0%
2012 California League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 3%
2012 California League of Conservation Voters - Positions 7%
2012 Clean Water Action California - Positions 40%
2011-2012 California Park and Recreation Society - Positions 64%
2011 California League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 2%
2011 California League of Conservation Voters - Positions 6%
2011 Sierra Club California - Positions 23%
2008 California League of Conservation Voters - Positions on Environmental Conservation 5
2007 California League of Conservation Voters - Positions on Environmental Conservation 5
2007 Sierra Club California - Positions on Environmental Conservation 0
2006 California League of Conservation Voters - Positions 0%
2006 Environment California - Positions on Environmental Conservation 6
2006 Sierra Club California - Positions on Environmental Conservation 0
2005-2006 California Park and Recreation Society - Positions 40
2005 California League of Conservation Voters - Positions 0%
2005 Sierra Club California - Positions 0%
2004 California League of Conservation Voters - Positions 0%
2004 Sierra Club California - Positions 0%
2003-2004 California Park and Recreation Society - Positions 30%
2003 California League of Conservation Voters - Positions 0%
2003 Sierra Club California - Positions 0%

Social

2014 Heritage Action for America - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 67%
2013-2014 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score (Jan. 13, 2014) 20%
2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Crucial Votes Lifetime Score 4%
2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Lifetime Score 3%
2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Overall Positions 3%
2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Crucial Votes 4%
2013 Americans United for the Separation of Church and State - Positions 100%
2013 Bread for the World - Positions 10%
2013 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2013 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2013 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2013 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 43%
2013 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 0%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy 87%
2013 National Right to Life Committee - Positions (Jan. 14, 2014) 100%
2013 The John Birch Society - Positions 70%
2013 The John Birch Society - Positions 70%
2012 American Conservative Union (California State Legislature) - Positions 96%
2012 Capitol Resource Institute - Positions 100%
2012 Children's Advocacy Institute - Positions 66%
2011 Capitol Resource Institute - Positions 100%
2011 Children's Advocacy Institute - Positions 48%
2007-2008 Friends Committee on Legislation of California - Positions 14%
2007 Children's Advocacy Institute - Positions on Child and Youth Issues 58
2006 Children's Advocacy Institute - Positions on Child and Youth Issues 36
2005 Children's Advocacy Institute - Positions on Child and Youth Issues 35
2005 Jericho - Positions 33%
2004 Children's Advocacy Institute - Positions on Child and Youth Issues 29
2004 Friends Committee on Legislation of California - Positions 0%
2003 Children's Advocacy Institute - Positions 43%
2003 Friends Committee on Legislation of California - Positions 22%
2002-2003 Jericho - Positions 38%
2002 Christian Coalition of California - Positions 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top