| Current Office: | U.S. House - District 14, Republican |
|---|---|
| First Elected: | 11/05/1996 |
| Last Elected: | 11/02/2010 |
| Next Election: | 2012 |
| Current Office: | U.S. House - District 14, Republican |
|---|---|
| First Elected: | 11/05/1996 |
| Last Elected: | 11/02/2010 |
| Next Election: | 2012 |
| 2007 | League of Women Voters - Campaign Finance and Election Issues Score | 0% |
| 2009 | Women Employed - Positions | 0% |
| 2008 | Latin America Working Group - Positions | 50% |
| 2007 | National Employment Lawyers Association - Positions | 0% |
| 2009 | The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions | 80% |
| 2001-2002 | American Bar Association - Positions | 50% |
| 1999-2000 | American Bar Association - Positions | 0% |
| 2010 | American Security Council Foundation - Positions | 60% |
| 2009 | American Security Council Foundation - Positions | 60% |
| 2007-2008 | American Security Council Foundation - Positions | 0% |
| 2007-2008 | Center for Security Policy - Positions | 18% |
| 2005-2006 | Center for Security Policy - Positions | 31% |
| 2003-2004 | American Security Council Foundation - Positions | 29% |
| 2003-2004 | Center for Security Policy - Positions | 27% |
| 2002 | American Security Council Foundation - Positions | 50% |
| 2001-2010 | Keep America Safe - Positions | 5% |
| 1998-2002 | Center for Security Policy - Positions | 40% |
| 1997 | Center for Security Policy - Positions | 50% |
| 2008 | CNET News - Positions | 88% |
| 2007-2008 | Information Technology Industry Council - Positions | 0% |
| 2007 | AeA - Positions | 0% |
| 2007 | Computer & Communications Industry Association - Positions | 39% |
| 2006 | CNET News - Positions | 80% |
| 2005-2006 | Computer & Communications Industry Association - Positions | 57% |
| 2005-2006 | Information Technology Industry Council - Positions | 33% |
| 2003-2004 | Information Technology Industry Council - Positions | 44% |
| 2002 | Information Technology Industry Council - Positions | 30% |
| 2000 | Information Technology Industry Council - Positions | 41% |
| 1999 | Information Technology Industry Council - Positions | 38% |
| 2009-2010 | International Foodservice Distributors Association - Positions | 100% |
| 2009-2010 | USA Engage - Positions | 80% |
| 2008 | The Alliance for Worker Freedom - Positions | 89% |
| 2007-2008 | International Foodservice Distributors Association - Positions | 87% |
| 2007 | Associated Equipment Distributors - Positions | 25% |
| 2007 | The Alliance for Worker Freedom - Positions | 72% |
| 2003-2004 | The Cato Institute - Trade Barrier Votes Score | 60% |
| 2003-2004 | The Cato Institute - Trade Subsidy Votes Score | 100% |
| 2003-2004 | USA Engage - Positions | 40% |
| 2001-2002 | The Cato Institute - Trade Subsidy Votes Score | 100% |
| 2001-2002 | The Cato Institute - Trade Barrier Votes Score | 64% |
| 2001-2002 | USA Engage - Positions | 40% |
| 1999-2000 | The Cato Institute - Trade Barrier Votes Score | 67% |
| 1999-2000 | The Cato Institute - Trade Subsidy Votes Score | 100% |
| 1997-1998 | The Cato Institute - Trade Subsidy Votes Score | 78% |
| 2005-2006 | American Road and Transportation Builders Association - Positions | 0% |
| 2003-2004 | American Road and Transportation Builders Association - Positions | 0% |
| 2009 | Disabled American Veterans - House of Representatives Score | 100% |
| 2006 | Disabled American Veterans - Positions | 100% |
| 2006 | The Retired Enlisted Association - Retired Military Benefits Issues Score | 57% |
| 2005 | Disabled American Veterans - Positions | 40% |
| 2004 | Disabled American Veterans - Positions | 100% |
| 2004 | The Retired Enlisted Association - Positions | 0% |
| 2003-2004 | Vietnam Veterans of America - Positions | 38% |
| 2003 | American Veterans - Positions | 50% |
| 2003 | Disabled American Veterans - Positions | 50% |
| 2003 | The American Legion - Positions | 60% |
| 2001 | Disabled American Veterans - Positions | 100% |
| 2001 | Vietnam Veterans of America - Positions | 77% |
| 1999 | Disabled American Veterans - Positions | 100% |
| 1997-1998 | Vietnam Veterans of America - Positions | 80% |
| 2011 | Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions | 14% |
| 2010 | Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions | 13% |
| 2009 | Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions | 0 |
| 2008 | Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions | 0% |
| 2007-2008 | Alliance to Stop the War on the Poor - Positions on Affordable Energy | 88% |
| 2007-2008 | RESULTS - Positions | 0% |
| 2005-2006 | RESULTS - Positions | 43% |
| 2003-2004 | Bread for the World - Positions | 25% |
| 2003-2004 | The Partnership for the Homeless - Positions | 33% |
| 2003 | Bread for the World - Positions | 0% |
| 2001-2002 | Bread for the World - Positions | 33% |
| 2000 | Bread for the World - Positions | 0% |
| 1999 | Bread for the World - Positions | 0% |
| 1998 | Bread for the World - Positions | 0% |
| 1997 | Bread for the World - Positions | 75% |
| 2011 | Federally Employed Women - Positions | 66% |
| 2010 | Federally Employed Women - Positions | 50% |
| 2009 | Federally Employed Women - Positions | 30% |
| 2009 | Women Employed - Positions | 0% |
| 2007-2008 | Federally Employed Women - Equality in Government Score | 30 |
| 2007-2008 | National Organization for Women - Positions | 0% |
| 2007 | Federally Employed Women - Positions | 50% |
| 2006 | United States Women's Chamber of Commerce - Positions | 44% |
| 2005-2006 | Business and Professional Women USA - Positions | 50% |
| 2005-2006 | Federally Employed Women - Positions | 50% |
| 2005-2006 | National Organization for Women - Positions | 50% |
| 2005 | National Organization for Women - Positions | 57% |
| 2004 | United States Women's Chamber of Commerce - Positions | 50% |
| 2003-2004 | Business and Professional Women USA - Positions | 23% |
| 2003-2004 | Federally Employed Women - Positions | 10% |
| 2003 | Business and Professional Women USA - Positions | 0% |
| 2001-2002 | Business and Professional Women USA - Positions | 18% |
| 1998 | National Organization for Women - Positions | 20% |
Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.
Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.
Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.
One Common Ground, Philipsburg, MT 59858 Hotline: 888-Vote-Smart (888-868-3762)
All content © 2002 - 2012 Project Vote Smart unless otherwise attributed - Legislative demographic data provided by Aristotle International, Inc.