Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Ken Cheuvront's Ratings and Endorsements

2012 Endorsements

Environment

2010 Sierra Club, Grand Canyon Chapter - Positions on Environmental Conservation A
2009 Arizona League of Conservation Voters - Positions 67%
2009 Sierra Club, Grand Canyon Chapter - Positions on Environmental Conservation D
2008 Arizona League of Conservation Voters - Positions on Environmental Conservation 87
2008 Sierra Club, Grand Canyon Chapter - Positions on Environmental Conservation B
2007 Arizona League of Conservation Voters - Positions 86%
2007 Sierra Club, Grand Canyon Chapter - Positions on Environmental Conservation B
2006 Arizona League of Conservation Voters - Positions 65%
2006 Sierra Club, Grand Canyon Chapter - Positions on Environmental Conservation C
2005 Arizona League of Conservation Voters - Positions 82%
2005 Sierra Club, Grand Canyon Chapter - Positions 80%
2004 Arizona League of Conservation Voters - Positions 100%
2004 Sierra Club, Grand Canyon Chapter - Positions on Environmental Conservation A
2003 Arizona League of Conservation Voters - Positions 100%
2003 Sierra Club, Grand Canyon Chapter - Positions on Environmental Conservation A
2002 Arizona League of Conservation Voters - Positions 90%
2002 Sierra Club, Grand Canyon Chapter - Positions on Environmental Conservation A
2001 Arizona League of Conservation Voters - Positions 88%
2001 Sierra Club, Grand Canyon Chapter - Positions on Environmental Conservation A
2000 Sierra Club, Grand Canyon Chapter - Positions on Environmental Conservation A
1999-2000 Arizona League of Conservation Voters - Positions 96%
1999 Sierra Club, Grand Canyon Chapter - Positions on Environmental Conservation B
1998 Sierra Club, Grand Canyon Chapter - Positions on Environmental Conservation 0%
1997 Sierra Club, Grand Canyon Chapter - Positions on Environmental Conservation A

Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity

2006 Equality Arizona - Positions 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top