or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

John BT Campbell III

John BT Campbell III's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Foreign Affairs

Full Name: John BT Campbell III
Current Office: U.S. House - District 45, Republican
First Elected: 12/06/2005
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2014

Foreign Affairs

2014 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 0%
2014 Peace Action West - Positions (June 3, 2014) 0%
2013-2014 Council for a Livable World - Positions (House) 0%
2013 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 29%
2013 Peace Action West - Positions (Nov. 20, 2013) 0%
2012 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score 0%
2012 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 47%
2012 National Journal - House Liberal (Foreign) 57%
2012 Peace Action - Positions 50%
2011-2012 ACT! for America - Positions 100%
2011-2012 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 44%
2011-2012 PeacePAC - Positions (PeacePAC is sister organization of Council for a Livable World rating House Only) 67%
2011-2012 USA Engage - Positions 63%
2011 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 89%
2011 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score 0%
2011 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 67%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 45%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 54%
2011 Peace Action West - Positions 77%
2010 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 71%
2010 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score F
2010 Latin America Working Group - Positions (House only) 0%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 35%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 65%
2010 Peace Action - Positions 63%
2010 Peace Action West - Positions 63%
2009-2010 ACT! for America - Positions 100%
2009-2010 PeacePAC - Positions (PeacePAC is sister organization of Council for a Livable World rating House Only) 33%
2009-2010 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -9%
2009-2010 USA Engage - Positions 75%
2009-2010 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 20%
2009 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 78%
2009 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 27%
2009 Latin America Working Group - Positions 0%
2009 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 37%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 63%
2009 NewPolicy.org - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy 0%
2009 Peace Action West - Positions 23%
2009 Resolve Uganda - Lifetime Score 0%
2009 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -3%
2008 Armenian National Committee of America - Positions on Armenian American Issues B
2008 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score D-
2008 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 50%
2008 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 21%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 78%
2008 Peace Action West - Positions 10%
2008 Resolve Uganda - Lifetime Score F
2007-2009 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score F
2007-2008 ACT! for America - Positions 100%
2007-2008 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 90%
2007-2008 Council for a Livable World - Positions 12%
2007-2008 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 33%
2007-2008 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 0%
2007-2008 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -4
2007-2008 USA Engage - Positions on Trade and Engagement C
2007-2008 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions -2
2007 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score F
2007 Council for a Livable World - Positions 7%
2007 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 9%
2007 Latin America Working Group - Positions 0%
2007 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 0%
2007 Peace Action West - Positions 0%
2007 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -3
2007 United To End Genocide - Positions on Darfur C
2007 Voices for Creative Nonviolence - Iraq-Afghanistan Supplemental Spending Score 0%
2006-2012 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 77%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 86%
2006 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 6%
2006 Peace Action - Positions 14%
2006 Peace Action West - Positions 14%
2006 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 50%
2005-2006 ACT! for America - Positions 41%
2005-2006 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 8%
2005-2006 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 8%
2005-2006 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -5
2005 PeacePAC - Positions 0%
2002-2006 Voices for Creative Nonviolence - Iraq War Resolution and Funding 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top