Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Wilma Chan's Ratings and Endorsements

Office: Supervisor (Alameda County, CA) - District 3, No Party Affiliation

Civil Liberties and Civil Rights

2006 Asian Americans for Civil Rights and Equality - Positions on Civil Rights & Equality 100%
2006 California Communities United Institute - Positions on Underrepresented Group Issues 99
2006 California Communities United Institute - LGBTI Rights Score 97
2006 Lambda Letters Project - Women's Issues Score 98
2006 Lambda Letters Project - Economic Policy Score 100
2006 Lambda Letters Project - Minority Rights Policy Score 100
2006 Lambda Letters Project - HIV/AIDS Policy Score 100
2006 Race Forward - Positions on Racial Justice 100
2005-2006 Equality California - Positions on LGBT Rights 100
2005 Asian Americans for Civil Rights and Equality - Positions 100%
2005 California Communities United Institute - Positions 100%
2005 Equality California - Positions 100%
2005 Lambda Letters Project - Minority Rights Policy Score 100%
2005 Lambda Letters Project - HIV/AIDS Policy Score 100%
2005 Lambda Letters Project - Women's Issues Score 100%
2005 Race Forward - Positions on Racial Justice 100
2004 Asian Americans for Civil Rights and Equality - Positions 100%
2004 California Communities United Institute - Positions 100%
2004 Equality California - Positions 0%
2004 Lambda Letters Project - HIV/AIDS Policy Score 100%
2004 Lambda Letters Project - Minority Rights Policy Score 100%
2004 Lambda Letters Project - Women's Issues Score 96%
2004 Race Forward - Positions 100%
2003 Asian Americans for Civil Rights and Equality - Positions 100%
2003 California Communities United Institute - Positions 99%
2003 Equality California - Positions 94%
2002 California Communities United Institute - Positions 100%
2002 Equality California - Positions 100%
2001 Equality California - Positions 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top