Search Form
Now choose a category »
 

Wilma Chan's Ratings and Endorsements

Office: Supervisor (Alameda County, CA) - District 3, Democratic

Business and Consumers

2006 California Chamber of Commerce - Positions on Pro-Business Policy 19%
2006 California Manufacturers and Technology Association - Positions on Manufacturers Advocacy 0
2006 California National Federation of Independent Business - Positions on Pro-Small Business Policy 15
2006 California Public Interest Research Group - Positions on Public Interest Advocacy 100
2006 Consumer Federation of California - Positions on Consumer Advocacy 100
2005-2006 California Manufacturers and Technology Association - Positions 0%
2005 California Chamber of Commerce - Positions 17%
2005 California Public Interest Research Group - Positions 100%
2004 California Chamber of Commerce - Positions 13%
2004 California Public Interest Research Group - Positions 100%
2003-2004 California Manufacturers and Technology Association - Positions 18%
2003-2004 California National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 10%
2003 California Chamber of Commerce - Positions 11%
2003 California Public Interest Research Group - Positions 93%
2002 Alliance for Better Business - Positions 100%
2002 California Chamber of Commerce - Positions 0%
2002 California Public Interest Research Group - Positions 95%
2002 Consumer Federation of California - Positions 94%
2002 Silicon Valley Leadership Group - Positions 65%
2001-2002 California National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 0%
2001 Alliance for Better Business - Positions 100%
2001 California Chamber of Commerce - Positions 20%

Civil Liberties and Civil Rights

2006 Applied Research Center - Positions on Racial Justice 100
2006 Asian Americans for Civil Rights and Equality - Positions on Civil Rights & Equality 100%
2006 California Communities United Institute - Positions on Underrepresented Group Issues 99
2006 California Communities United Institute - LGBTI - LGBTI Rights Score 97
2006 Lambda Letters Project - HIV/AIDS Policy Score 100
2006 Lambda Letters Project - Economic Policy Score 100
2006 Lambda Letters Project - Women's Issues Score 98
2006 Lambda Letters Project - Minority Rights Policy Score 100
2005-2006 Equality California - Positions on LGBT Rights 100
2005 Applied Research Center - Positions on Racial Justice 100
2005 Asian Americans for Civil Rights and Equality - Positions 100%
2005 California Communities United Institute - LGBTI - Positions 100%
2005 Equality California - Positions 100%
2005 Lambda Letters Project - Women's Issues Score 100%
2005 Lambda Letters Project - HIV/AIDS Policy Score 100%
2005 Lambda Letters Project - Minority Rights Policy Score 100%
2004 Applied Research Center - Positions 100%
2004 Asian Americans for Civil Rights and Equality - Positions 100%
2004 California Communities United Institute - LGBTI - Positions 100%
2004 Equality California - Positions 0%
2004 Lambda Letters Project - HIV/AIDS Policy Score 100%
2004 Lambda Letters Project - Minority Rights Policy Score 100%
2004 Lambda Letters Project - Women's Issues Score 96%
2003 Asian Americans for Civil Rights and Equality - Positions 100%
2003 California Communities United Institute - Positions 99%
2003 Equality California - Positions 94%
2002 California Communities United Institute - Positions 100%
2002 Equality California - Positions 100%
2001 Equality California - Positions 100%
1997-2003 Gay Rights Information - Positions on LGBT Rights 0%
1997-2001 Gay Rights Information - Positions on LGBT Rights 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top