Curren De Mille Price, Jr.'s Special Interest Group Ratings

Biographical

Full Name: Curren De Mille Price, Jr.
Current Office: Council Member - District 9, Democratic
First Elected: 06/2013
Gender: Male
Birth Place: Los Angeles,CA
Home City: Inglewood, CA
View 2010 Endorsements
Filter by Issue
How To Interpret These Evaluations

Business and Consumers

2013 California Chamber of Commerce - Positions 50% 2012 California Chamber of Commerce - Positions 45% 2012 California Manufacturers and Technology Association - Positions 42% 2012 California National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 46% 2012 Consumer Federation of California - Lifetime Score 84% 2012 Consumer Federation of California - Positions on Consumer Issues 78% 2011 California Chamber of Commerce - Positions 25% 2011 California Manufacturers and Technology Association - Positions 27% 2011 California National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 40% 2011 Consumer Federation of California - Lifetime Score 85% 2011 Consumer Federation of California - Positions 80% 2010 California Chamber of Commerce - Positions 53% 2010 California Manufacturers and Technology Association - Positions 30% 2010 Consumer Federation of California - Positions 69% 2009 California Chamber of Commerce - Positions 23% 2009 California National Federation of Independent Business - State Senate Score 20% 2009 California National Federation of Independent Business - State Assembly Score 14% 2009 California Public Interest Research Group - Positions 100% 2009 Consumer Federation of California - Positions 93% 2008 California Chamber of Commerce - Positions on Pro-Business Policy 13% 2008 California Manufacturers and Technology Association - Positions on Manufacturers Advocacy 9 2008 Consumer Federation of California - Positions 86% 2007-2008 California National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 13% 2007 California Chamber of Commerce - Positions on Pro-Business Policy 14 2007 California Manufacturers and Technology Association - Positions on Manufacturers Advocacy 0 2007 California Public Interest Research Group - Positions on Public Interest Advocacy 87 2007 Consumer Federation of California - Positions 100% 2005-2010 Consumer Federation of California - Cumulative Score 86% 2005-2009 Consumer Federation of California - Positions 92%

Civil Liberties and Civil Rights

2011 California Communities United Institute - Positions 99 2011 Republican Liberty Caucus of California - Civil Liberties Score 23% 2011 Republican Liberty Caucus of California - Economic Liberties Score 13% 2011 Republican Liberty Caucus of California - Overall Score 18% 2010 California Communities United Institute - Minority Issues Score 100% 2010 California Communities United Institute - Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender Intersex Score 100% 2010 California Communities United Institute - Overall Score 98% 2010 California Communities United Institute - Positions on AIDS Policy 100% 2010 California Communities United Institute - Women's Issues Score 93% 2010 California Communities United Institute - Positions on Economic Justice 97% 2009 Applied Research Center - Green Equity Score 100% 2009 Applied Research Center - Positions on Civil Rights 100% 2009 Applied Research Center - Overall Score 65% 2009 Applied Research Center - Positions on Education Equity 100% 2009 Applied Research Center - Health Equity Score 80% 2009 Applied Research Center - Positions on Criminal Justice 67% 2009 Applied Research Center - Leadership Score 0% 2009 Applied Research Center - Housing and Economics Score 50% 2009 Applied Research Center - Legal Racism Score 0% 2008 Equality California - Positions 100% 2007 Applied Research Center - Positions on Racial Justice 100 2007 Asian Americans for Civil Rights and Equality - Positions on Civil Rights & Equality 100 2007 California Communities United Institute - Positions 100 2007 California Communities United Institute - LGBTI - LGBTI Rights Score 100 2007 Equality California - Positions on LGBT Rights 100 2007 Lambda Letters Project - Women's Issues Score 100 2007 Lambda Letters Project - Minority Rights Policy Score 100 2007 Lambda Letters Project - Economic Policy Score 100

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.