Search Form
Now choose a category »
 

Curren De Mille Price, Jr.'s Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity

Office: Council Member (Los Angeles, CA) - District 9, Democratic

2010 Endorsements

Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity

2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on Economic Justice 91%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Overall Positions (Senate Only) 91%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on LGBT 100%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on HIV/AIDS 100%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on People of Color 93%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on Latino Issues 95%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on Womens Issues 85%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on Asians and Pacific Islanders 95%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on African Americans 88%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions 91%
2012 Equality California - Positions 100%
2011 California Communities United Institute - Positions 99
2011 Equality California - Positions 100%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Minority Issues Score 100%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender Intersex Score 100%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Positions on Economic Justice 97%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Women's Issues Score 93%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Overall Score 98%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Positions on AIDS Policy 100%
2010 Equality California - Positions 100%
2009 Equality California - Positions on LGBT Rights 100%
2007 California Communities United Institute - Positions 100
2007 California Communities United Institute - LGBTI - LGBTI Rights Score 100

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top