or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Kevin McCarthy

Kevin McCarthy's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Budget, Spending and Taxes

Full Name: Kevin McCarthy
Current Office: U.S. House - District 23, Republican
First Elected: 11/07/2006
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2014
On The Ballot: Running, Republican for U.S. House - District 23
General Nov. 4, 2014
Primary June 3, 2014

Budget, Spending and Taxes

2013 Alliance for Retired Americans - Lifetime Score 10%
2013 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 10%
2013 Bread for the World - Positions 30%
2013 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 71%
2013 FreedomWorks - Positions 43%
2013 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy 42%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy 57%
2013 Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions 22%
2013 The Club for Growth - Positions 53%
2013 The Club for Growth - Positions (lifetime) 78%
2012 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 0%
2012 Alliance for Retired Americans - Lifetime Score 11%
2012 Bread for the World - Positions 0%
2012 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 7%
2012 FreedomWorks - Positions 37%
2012 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 72%
2012 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 72%
2012 Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions 35%
2012 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 0%
2011 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 0%
2011 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 71%
2011 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 0%
2011 FreedomWorks - Positions 74%
2011 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 72%
2011 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 72%
2011 Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions 11%
2011 The Club for Growth - Positions 63%
2010 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 79%
2010 FreedomWorks - Positions 78%
2010 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 86%
2010 Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions 27%
2010 The Club for Growth - Positions 96%
2009-2010 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 87%
2009-2010 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 0%
2009 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 10%
2009 Alliance for Retired Americans - Lifetime Score 20%
2009 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 84%
2009 FreedomWorks - Positions 90%
2009 Heritage Alliance - Positions 94%
2009 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 87%
2009 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 87%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 100%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 73%
2009 Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions 17
2009 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 0%
2009 The Club for Growth - Positions 90%
2008 Alliance for Retired Americans - Lifetime Score 25%
2008 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 50%
2008 Americans for Fair Taxation - Positions on the FairTax 0
2008 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 81%
2008 Citizens Against Government Waste - Lifetime Score 79%
2008 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions on Middle Class Advocacy 40
2008 FreedomWorks - Positions 95%
2008 National Taxpayers Union - Fiscally Conservative Score B+
2008 National Taxpayers Union - Fiscally Conservative Score B+
2008 Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions 41%
2008 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 16%
2008 The Club for Growth - Positions 86%
2007-2008 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 95%
2007-2008 Population Action International - Positions 0%
2007 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 0%
2007 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 100%
2007 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 76%
2007 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions on Middle Class Advocacy 20
2007 FreedomWorks - Positions 90%
2007 National Taxpayers Union - Fiscally Conservative Score B+
2007 National Taxpayers Union - Fiscally Conservative Score B+
2007 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 96%
2007 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 61%
2007 Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions on Poverty Action D
2007 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 10%
2007 The Club for Growth - Positions 66%
2006 California Taxpayers' Association - Positions on Tax and Fiscal Policy 100
2006 Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association - Positions on Tax Reduction 100
2005 California Taxpayers' Association - Positions 100%
2005 Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association - Positions 92
2004 California Taxpayers' Association - Positions 100%
2004 Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association - Positions 99
2003 California Taxpayers' Association - Positions 100%
2003 Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association - Positions 97

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top