or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Jeffrey 'Jeff' Denham

Jeffrey 'Jeff' Denham's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Conservative

Full Name: Jeffrey 'Jeff' Denham
Current Office: U.S. House - District 10, Republican
First Elected: 11/02/2010
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2014
On The Ballot: Running, Republican for U.S. House - District 10
General Nov. 4, 2014
Primary June 3, 2014

Conservative

2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score 72%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (Jan. 7, 2014) 70%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score 72%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (Jan. 7, 2014) 70%
2014 Heritage Action for America - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 38%
2014 Heritage Action for America - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 38%
2014 Heritage Action for America - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 38%
2013 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 77%
2013 American Conservative Union - Positions 60%
2013 Competitive Enterprise Institute - Workplace Choice (August, 2013) 100%
2013 Concerned Women for America - Positions 92%
2013 Concerned Women for America - Positions 92%
2013 Eagle Forum - Positions 33%
2013 Eagle Forum - Positions 33%
2013 FreedomWorks - Positions 48%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy 54%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy 57%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy 54%
2013 National Journal - Conservative (Composite) 56%
2013 The Club for Growth - Positions (lifetime) 58%
2013 The Club for Growth - Positions 51%
2013 The John Birch Society - Positions 50%
2013 The John Birch Society - Positions 50%
2013 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 50
2012 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 86%
2012 American Conservative Union - Ratings of Congress 88%
2012 Catholic Advocate - Positions 100%
2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2012 Family Research Council - Positions 100%
2012 FreedomWorks - Positions 26%
2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Foreign) 66%
2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Social) 57%
2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Composite Score) 63%
2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Economic) 63%
2012 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 70%
2012 The Club for Growth - Positions 60%
2012 The John Birch Society - Positions 65%
2012 The John Birch Society - Positions 65%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 73%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime score 74%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime score 74%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 73%
2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 59%
2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 59%
2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 59%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 15%
2011-2012 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100%
2011 American Conservative Union - Positions 84%
2011 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 84%
2011 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 76%
2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 76%
2011 Family Research Council - Positions 90%
2011 FreedomWorks - Positions 77%
2011 Heritage Action for America - Positions (House Only) 90%
2011 Heritage Action for America - Positions (House Only) 90%
2011 Heritage Action for America - Positions (House Only) 90%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 30%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 82%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 100%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 69%
2011 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 81%
2011 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100%
2011 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 73%
2011 The Club for Growth - Positions 64%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 75%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 80%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 80%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 75%
2011 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 75%
2010 California Republican Assembly - Positions 100%
2009 California Republican Assembly - Positions 78%
2008 California Republican Assembly - Positions 94%
2007-2008 Capitol Resource Institute - Positions 87%
2007 California Republican Assembly - Positions on Republican Principles 84
2006 California Republican Assembly - Positions on Republican Principles 65
2005 California Republican Assembly - Positions 61%
2004 California Republican Assembly - Positions 95%
2003 California Republican Assembly - Positions 100%
2002 Christian Coalition of California - Positions 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top