or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Jeffrey 'Jeff' Denham

Jeffrey 'Jeff' Denham's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Civil Liberties and Civil Rights

Full Name: Jeffrey 'Jeff' Denham
Current Office: U.S. House - District 10, Republican
First Elected: 11/02/2010
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2014
On The Ballot: Running, Republican for U.S. House - District 10
General Nov. 4, 2014
Primary June 3, 2014

Civil Liberties and Civil Rights

2014 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions (captured January 3, 2014) 10%
2014 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions (captured June 17, 2014) 7%
2014 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 0%
2014 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 29%
2013 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 50%
2013 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 15%
2012 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 5%
2012 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 7%
2012 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 7%
2012 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Total Score 0%
2012 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions on Civil Rights 0%
2011-2012 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 0%
2011-2012 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 0%
2011-2012 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights 56%
2011 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions (House Only) 0%
2011 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 0%
2011 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 0%
2011 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) 10%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Women's Issues Score 39%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender Intersex Score 16%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Positions on Economic Justice 49%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Positions on AIDS Policy 17%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Overall Score 35%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Minority Issues Score 23%
2009 Applied Research Center - Green Equity Score 0%
2009 Applied Research Center - Health Equity Score 0%
2009 Applied Research Center - Legal Racism Score 0%
2009 Applied Research Center - Positions on Education Equity 67%
2009 Applied Research Center - Housing and Economics Score 25%
2009 Applied Research Center - Positions on Criminal Justice 33%
2009 Applied Research Center - Leadership Score 0%
2009 Applied Research Center - Overall Score 22%
2009 Applied Research Center - Positions on Civil Rights 50%
2008 Equality California - Positions 0%
2007 Applied Research Center - Positions on Racial Justice 25
2007 Asian Americans for Civil Rights and Equality - Positions on Civil Rights & Equality 15
2007 California Communities United Institute - Positions 22
2007 California Communities United Institute - LGBTI - LGBTI Rights Score 15
2007 Equality California - Positions on LGBT Rights 0
2007 Lambda Letters Project - Women's Issues Score 20
2007 Lambda Letters Project - Economic Policy Score 33
2007 Lambda Letters Project - Minority Rights Policy Score 42
2006-2012 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 100%
2006 Applied Research Center - Positions on Racial Justice 40
2006 Asian Americans for Civil Rights and Equality - Positions on Civil Rights & Equality 33%
2006 California Communities United Institute - Positions on Underrepresented Group Issues 28
2006 California Communities United Institute - LGBTI - LGBTI Rights Score 0
2006 Lambda Letters Project - Economic Policy Score 36
2006 Lambda Letters Project - HIV/AIDS Policy Score 0
2006 Lambda Letters Project - Minority Rights Policy Score 46
2006 Lambda Letters Project - Women's Issues Score 60
2005-2006 Equality California - Positions on LGBT Rights 0
2005 Applied Research Center - Positions on Racial Justice 36
2005 Asian Americans for Civil Rights and Equality - Positions 23%
2005 California Communities United Institute - LGBTI - Positions 15%
2005 Equality California - Positions 7%
2005 Lambda Letters Project - HIV/AIDS Policy Score 20%
2005 Lambda Letters Project - Minority Rights Policy Score 55%
2005 Lambda Letters Project - Women's Issues Score 63%
2004 Applied Research Center - Positions 20%
2004 Asian Americans for Civil Rights and Equality - Positions 23%
2004 California Communities United Institute - LGBTI - Positions 11%
2004 Lambda Letters Project - HIV/AIDS Policy Score 0%
2004 Lambda Letters Project - Minority Rights Policy Score 6%
2004 Lambda Letters Project - Women's Issues Score 30%
2003 Asian Americans for Civil Rights and Equality - Positions 36%
2003 California Communities United Institute - Positions 22%
2003 Equality California - Positions 6%
1997-2003 Gay Rights Information - Positions on LGBT Rights 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top