Search Form
Now choose a category »
 

Ann Kirkpatrick's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Foreign Affairs

Office: U.S. House (AZ) - District 1, Democratic
On The Ballot: Running, Democratic for U.S. House - District 1

Foreign Affairs

2014 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 0%
2014 Peace Action West - Positions (June 3, 2014) 44%
2013-2014 Council for a Livable World - Positions (House) 70%
2013 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 57%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy 43%
2013 Peace Action West - Positions (Nov. 20, 2013) 44%
2010 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 50%
2010 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score C+
2010 Latin America Working Group - Positions (House only) 0%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 49%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 49%
2010 Peace Action - Positions 38%
2010 Peace Action West - Positions 38%
2009-2010 ACT! for America - Positions 90%
2009-2010 Council for a Livable World - Positions 33%
2009-2010 PeacePAC - Positions (PeacePAC is sister organization of Council for a Livable World rating House Only) 33%
2009-2010 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -5%
2009-2010 USA Engage - Positions 40%
2009-2010 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 10%
2009 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 70%
2009 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 42%
2009 Latin America Working Group - Positions 25%
2009 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 40%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 59%
2009 NewPolicy.org - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy 0%
2009 Peace Action West - Positions 15%
2009 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -3%
2008 Resolve Uganda - Lifetime Score F
2007-2009 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score C+
2006-2012 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 50%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top