or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Ann Kirkpatrick

Ann Kirkpatrick's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Conservative

Full Name: Ann Kirkpatrick
Current Office: U.S. House - District 1, Democratic
First Elected: 11/06/2012
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2014
On The Ballot: Running, Democratic for U.S. House - District 1
Primary Aug. 26, 2014

Conservative

2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (Jan. 7, 2014) 11%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (June 23, 2014) 9%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (Jan. 7, 2014) 11%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score 16%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score (June 23, 2014) 15%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (June 23, 2014) 9%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score (June 23, 2014) 15%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score 16%
2014 Competitive Enterprise Institute - Positions 0
2014 Heritage Action for America - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 14%
2014 Heritage Action for America - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 14%
2014 Heritage Action for America - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 14%
2014 The John Birch Society - Positions 21%
2014 The John Birch Society - Lifetime Score 23%
2014 The John Birch Society - Lifetime Score 23%
2014 The John Birch Society - Positions 21%
2013-2014 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 7%
2013-2014 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 7%
2013-2014 Eagle Forum - Positions 0%
2013-2014 Eagle Forum - Positions 0%
2013 American Conservative Union - Positions 23%
2013 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 32%
2013 Competitive Enterprise Institute - Workplace Choice (August, 2013) 0%
2013 Concerned Women for America - Positions 23%
2013 Concerned Women for America - Positions 23%
2013 Eagle Forum - Positions 0%
2013 Eagle Forum - Positions 0%
2013 FreedomWorks - Positions 30%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy 42%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy 43%
2013 National Journal - Conservative (Composite) 42%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy 42%
2013 The Club for Growth - Positions (lifetime) 13%
2013 The Club for Growth - Positions 13%
2013 The John Birch Society - Positions 0%
2013 The John Birch Society - Positions 0%
2013 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 21
2010 American Conservative Union - Positions 36%
2010 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 36%
2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 0%
2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 0%
2010 FreedomWorks - Positions 17%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 49%
2010 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 51%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 46%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 56%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 43%
2010 The Club for Growth - Positions 22%
2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 20%
2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 20%
2009-2010 American Family Association - Positions 11%
2009-2010 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 20%
2009-2010 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 20%
2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 18%
2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 18%
2009-2010 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 20%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 13%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 13%
2009-2010 Family Research Council - Positions 12%
2009-2010 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 16%
2009-2010 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 37%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 25%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 25%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2010 27%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 30%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2010 27%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 30%
2009 American Conservative Union - Positions 36%
2009 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 36%
2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 18%
2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 18%
2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 18%
2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 18%
2009 FreedomWorks - Positions 29%
2009 Heritage Alliance - Positions 5%
2009 Heritage Alliance - Positions 5%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 47%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 59%
2009 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 55%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 57%
2009 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 25%
2009 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 33%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 29%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 39%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 39%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 29%
2009 The Club for Growth - Positions 30%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 20%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2009) 30%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2009) 30%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 20%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 25%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 25%
2007 Goldwater Institute - Positions 32%
2006 Americans for Prosperity - Arizona Chapter - Positions on Conservative Issues 28
2006 Goldwater Institute - Positions 33%
2005 Goldwater Institute - Positions 36%
2001-2010 Keep America Safe - Positions 77%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top