or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Thomas 'Tom' E. Petri

Representative Thomas 'Tom' E. Petri's Special Interest Group Ratings

Thomas 'Tom' E. Petri
Full Name: Thomas 'Tom' E. Petri
Current Office: U.S. House - District 6, Republican
First Elected: 04/03/1979
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2014

Government Operations

2010 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 91%
2009 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 92%
2008 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 71%
2008 Citizens Against Government Waste - Lifetime Score 83%
2007-2008 National Association of Counties - Positions on County Government Advocacy 50%
2007 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 91%
2006 State PIRGs Working Together - Positions 27%
2006 United States Public Interest Research Group - Positions 27%
2005-2006 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 79%
2005-2006 Freedom Democrats - Positions on Economic Issues 85%
2005-2006 Freedom Democrats - Positions on Social Issues 27%
2005-2006 National Association of Counties - Positions 43%
2005-2006 Public Citizen's Congress Watch - Positions on Population Stabilization 35%
2005 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 79%
2005 United States Public Interest Research Group - Positions 48%
2004 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 73%
2004 State PIRGs Working Together - Positions 43%
2004 United States Public Interest Research Group - Positions 43%
2003-2004 Public Citizen's Congress Watch - Positions 15%
2003-2004 Radical Middle - Positions 30%
2003 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 89%
2003 Public Citizen's Congress Watch - Positions 33%
2003 State PIRGs Working Together - Positions 38%
2003 United States Public Interest Research Group - Positions 38%
2002 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 79%
2002 United States Public Interest Research Group - Positions 40%
2001-2002 National Association of Counties - Positions 57%
2001-2002 Public Citizen's Congress Watch - Positions 27%
2001-2002 Radical Middle - Positions 15%
2001 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 81%
2001 United States Public Interest Research Group - Positions 25%
2000 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 92%
2000 National Association of Counties - Positions 57%
1999-2000 Common Cause - Lifetime Score 0%
1999-2000 Public Citizen's Congress Watch - Positions 20%
1999-2000 United States Public Interest Research Group - Positions 20%
1999 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 88%
1999 United States Public Interest Research Group - Positions 47%
1998 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 86%
1997-1998 Public Citizen's Congress Watch - Positions 42%
1997-1998 United States Public Interest Research Group - Positions 47%
1997 Public Citizen's Congress Watch - Positions 45%
1996 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 86%
1995-1996 Public Citizen's Congress Watch - Positions 34%
1995-1996 United States Public Interest Research Group - Positions 32%
1995 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 88%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top