Search Form
Now choose a category »
 

Thomas 'Tom' E. Petri's Ratings and Endorsements

Office: U.S. House (WI) - District 6, Republican

Conservative

2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score 72%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (Jan. 7, 2014) 70%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score (June 23, 2014) 71%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (June 23, 2014) 67%
2014 Heritage Action for America - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 65%
2014 The John Birch Society - Positions 80%
2014 The John Birch Society - Lifetime Score 61%
2013-2014 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 91%
2013-2014 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2013-2014 The New American - Positions (captured September 2, 2014) 76%
2013 American Conservative Union - Positions 76%
2013 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 77%
2013 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2013 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2013 National Journal - Conservative (Composite) 57%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy 48%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy 68%
2013 The John Birch Society - Positions 80%
2013 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 80
2012 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 77%
2012 American Conservative Union - Ratings of Congress 76%
2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Foreign) 46%
2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Composite Score) 58%
2012 The Club for Growth - Positions 74%
2012 The John Birch Society - Positions 78%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 77%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime score 73%
2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 95%
2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 96%
2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 61%
2011 American Conservative Union - Positions 72%
2011 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 77%
2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 96%
2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 66%
2011 Heritage Action for America - Positions (House Only) 86%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 47%
2011 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 55%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 52%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 80%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 90%
2011 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 80%
2010 American Conservative Union - Positions 88%
2010 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 77%
2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 88%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 68%
2010 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 77%
2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 80%
2009-2010 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 85%
2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 91%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2010 73%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 75%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 80%
2009 American Conservative Union - Positions 92%
2009 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 77%
2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2009 ConservAmerica - Positions 56
2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 90%
2009 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 69%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 67%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 70%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2009) 60%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 80%
2008 American Conservative Union - Positions 80%
2008 Eagle Forum - Positions 80%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 61%
2008 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 67.5%
2007-2009 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 60%
2007-2008 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 62%
2007-2008 Campaign for Working Families - Positions on Conservative Issues 94
2007-2008 Concerned Women for America - Positions 95%
2007-2008 ConservAmerica - Positions 72
2007-2008 The John Birch Society - Positions 60%
2007 American Conservative Union - Positions 72%
2007 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 63%
2007 ConservAmerica - Positions 80
2007 Eagle Forum - Positions 94%
2007 GOPUSA - Positions 7%
2007 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 63.7%
2007 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 55%
2007 The John Birch Society - Conservative Index Score 50%
2006 American Conservative Union - Positions 76%
2006 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 95%
2006 ConservAmerica - Positions 67
2006 Eagle Forum - Positions 86%
2006 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 57%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 51%
2006 The John Birch Society - Positions 43%
2005-2006 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 93%
2005-2006 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2005 American Conservative Union - Positions 72%
2005 ConservAmerica - Positions 42
2005 Eagle Forum - Positions 80%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 54%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 53%
2005 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 56%
2005 The John Birch Society - Positions 13%
2004 American Conservative Union - Positions 80%
2004 Christian Action Network - Lifetime Score 93%
2004 Eagle Forum - Positions 82%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 57%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring) 50%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Fall) 50%
2003-2004 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 93%
2003-2004 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2003 American Conservative Union - Positions 80%
2003 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 91%
2003 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2003 Eagle Forum - Positions 92%
2003 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 56%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 49%
2003 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer) 63%
2002 American Conservative Union - Positions 80%
2002 Eagle Forum - Positions 87%
2002 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 55%
2002 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 55%
2002 The John Birch Society - Positions 70%
2001-2010 Keep America Safe - Positions 93%
2001-2002 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 79%
2001-2002 Concerned Women for America - Positions 83%
2001 American Conservative Union - Positions 72%
2001 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 74%
2001 The John Birch Society - Positions 60%
2000 American Conservative Union - Positions 84%
2000 Concerned Women for America - Positions 93%
2000 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 49%
2000 The John Birch Society - Positions 60%
1999 American Conservative Union - Positions 80%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 62%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 73%
1999 The John Birch Society - Positions 65%
1998 American Conservative Union - Positions 88%
1998 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 68%
1998 The John Birch Society - Positions 58%
1997-1998 60 Plus Association - Positions 80%
1997-1998 Concerned Women for America - Positions 75%
1997 American Conservative Union - Positions 80%
1997 The John Birch Society - Positions 68%
1996 American Conservative Union - Positions 100%
1996 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 43%
1995-1996 60 Plus Association - Positions 100%
1995-1996 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
1995-1996 The John Birch Society - Positions 63%
1995 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 73%
1995 American Conservative Union - Positions 75%
1994 American Conservative Union - Positions 76%
1993 American Conservative Union - Positions 83%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top