or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Thomas 'Tom' M. Barrett

Thomas 'Tom' M. Barrett's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Business and Consumers

Full Name: Thomas 'Tom' M. Barrett
Current Office: Mayor (Milwaukee, WI) - At-Large, Democratic
Last Elected: 2000
Next Election: 2002

Business and Consumers

2002 National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association - Positions 33%
2002 United States Public Interest Research Group - Positions 95%
2001-2002 American Association of University Women - Positions 100%
2001-2002 National Association for the Self-Employed - Positions 42%
2001-2002 National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare - Positions 100%
2001 American Association of University Women - Positions 100%
2001 National Education Association - Positions 100%
2001 National Education Association - Positions 100%
2001 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 11%
2001 National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association - Positions 33%
2001 Population Connection - Positions 100%
2001 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 83%
2001 Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council - Positions 0%
2001 United Food & Commercial Workers - Positions 100%
2001 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 35%
2001 United States Public Interest Research Group - Positions 95%
2000 Associated Builders & Contractors - Positions 0%
2000 Business-Industry Political Action Committee - Positions 7%
2000 Consumer Federation of America - Positions 100%
2000 National Council of Senior Citizens - Positions 100%
2000 National Education Association - Positions 100%
2000 National Education Association - Positions 100%
2000 Population Connection - Positions 100%
2000 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 71%
2000 Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council - Positions 6%
2000 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 38%
1999-2000 American Association of University Women - Positions 87%
1999-2000 National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare - Positions 100%
1999-2000 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 5%
1999-2000 Public Citizen's Congress Watch - Positions 93%
1999-2000 United States Public Interest Research Group - Positions 100%
1999 American Association of University Women - Positions 100%
1999 Associated Builders & Contractors - Positions 0%
1999 Business-Industry Political Action Committee - Positions 7%
1999 Consumer Federation of America - Positions 92%
1999 National Council of Senior Citizens - Positions 100%
1999 National Education Association - Positions 90%
1999 National Education Association - Positions 90%
1999 Population Connection - Positions 100%
1999 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 12%
1999 United States Public Interest Research Group - Positions 100%
1998 Associated Builders & Contractors - Positions 18%
1998 Consumer Federation of America - Positions 80%
1998 National Council of Senior Citizens - Positions 100%
1998 Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council - Positions 15%
1998 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 17%
1997-1998 American Association of University Women - Positions 88%
1997-1998 National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare - Positions 80%
1997-1998 National Education Association - Positions 96%
1997-1998 National Education Association - Positions 96%
1997-1998 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 31%
1997-1998 Population Connection - Positions 100%
1997-1998 Public Citizen's Congress Watch - Positions 89%
1997-1998 United States Public Interest Research Group - Positions 100%
1997 American Association of University Women - Positions 80%
1997 Associated Builders & Contractors - Positions 40%
1997 Business-Industry Political Action Committee - Positions 7%
1997 Consumer Federation of America - Positions 83%
1997 National Council of Senior Citizens - Positions 80%
1997 National Education Association - Positions 100%
1997 National Education Association - Positions 100%
1997 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 40%
1997 Population Connection - Positions 100%
1997 Public Citizen's Congress Watch - Positions 91%
1997 United Food & Commercial Workers - Positions 92%
1997 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 40%
1996 Business-Industry Political Action Committee - Positions 3%
1996 Consumer Federation of America - Positions 85%
1996 National Council of Senior Citizens - Positions 100%
1996 National Education Association - Positions 91%
1996 National Education Association - Positions 91%
1996 Population Connection - Positions 100%
1996 United Food & Commercial Workers - Positions 100%
1996 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 25%
1995-1996 American Association of University Women - Positions 88%
1995-1996 Associated Builders & Contractors - Positions 29%
1995-1996 National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare - Positions 91%
1995-1996 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 24%
1995-1996 Public Citizen's Congress Watch - Positions 92%
1995-1996 United States Public Interest Research Group - Positions 95%
1995-1996 United States Student Association - Positions 91%
1995 Associated Builders & Contractors - Positions 33%
1995 United Food & Commercial Workers - Positions on Workplace Rights 95%
1994 United Food & Commercial Workers - Positions 88%
1993 United Food & Commercial Workers - Positions on Workplace Rights 88%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top