Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Nick Joe Rahall II's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Marriage, Family, and Children

Office: U.S. House (WV) - District 3, Democratic

Marriage, Family, and Children

2014 FRC Action - Positions 50%
2014 Population Connection - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 67%
2013-2014 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 53%
2013-2014 CitizenLink - Positions (House Only) 100%
2013-2014 Eagle Forum - Positions 43%
2013 Eagle Forum - Positions 0%
2013 Population Connection - Positions (Sept. 2013) 33%
2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 50%
2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 34%
2011 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 50%
2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 53%
2011 Family Research Council - Positions 50%
2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 11%
2009-2010 American Family Association - Positions 33%
2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 41%
2009-2010 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 30%
2009-2010 Family Research Council - Positions 37%
2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 36%
2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 19%
2009 Population Connection - Committee Votes Score 0%
2008 Eagle Forum - Positions 33%
2007-2008 American Family Association - Positions 0%
2007-2008 Campaign for Working Families - Positions on Conservative Issues 41
2007-2008 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 60%
2007-2008 Family Research Council - Positions 70%
2007-2008 Population Action International - Positions 0%
2007 American Academy of Family Physicians - Positions 100%
2007 Eagle Forum - Positions 47%
2007 Family Research Council - Positions 75
2007 League of Women Voters - Children's Health Issues Score 100%
2007 PFLAG, Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays - Positions 100%
2007 Population Connection - Positions on Population Stabilization 25%
2006 Eagle Forum - Positions 43%
2006 Family Research Council - Positions 85%
2006 Population Connection - Positions 43%
2005-2006 American Family Association - Positions 100%
2005-2006 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 61%
2005-2006 Population Action International - Positions on Reproductive Health 0%
2005 Eagle Forum - Positions 80%
2005 Family Research Council - Positions 67%
2005 Population Connection - Positions 33%
2004 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 61%
2004 Eagle Forum - Positions 45%
2004 Family Research Council - Positions 67%
2003-2004 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 63%
2003-2004 National Parent Teacher Association - Positions 100%
2003-2004 Population Action International - Positions 0%
2003-2004 Population Connection - Positions 14%
2003 American Family Association - Positions 100%
2003 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 59%
2003 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 61%
2003 Eagle Forum - Positions 38%
2003 Family Research Council - Positions 54%
2003 Population Action International - Positions 0%
2003 Population Connection - Positions 20%
2002 American Family Voices - Positions 100%
2002 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 50%
2002 Eagle Forum - Positions 47%
2002 Population Connection - Positions 56%
2001-2002 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 45%
2001-2002 Family Research Council - Positions 50%
2001-2002 National Parent Teacher Association - Positions 75%
2001 Family Research Council - Positions on Conservative Issues 50%
2001 Population Connection - Positions 60%
2000 Family Research Council - Positions 100%
2000 Population Connection - Positions 0%
1999-2000 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 43%
1999-2000 Home School Legal Defense Association - Positions 0%
1999-2000 National Parent Teacher Association - Positions 100%
1999 Population Connection - Positions 0%
1997-1998 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 53%
1997-1998 Home School Legal Defense Association - Positions 0%
1997-1998 Population Connection - Positions 0%
1997 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 56%
1997 Population Connection - Positions 0%
1996 Population Connection - Positions 10%
1995-1996 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 33%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top