or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Norman 'Norm' DeValois Dicks

Norman 'Norm' DeValois Dicks's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Foreign Affairs

Full Name: Norman 'Norm' DeValois Dicks

Foreign Affairs

2012 Arab American Institute - Positions on Arab-American Issues 4%
2012 Armenian National Committee of America - Positions 38%
2012 Bread for the World - Positions 75%
2012 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score 92%
2012 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 53%
2012 National Journal - House Liberal (Foreign) 63%
2012 Peace Action - Positions 54%
2011-2012 ACT! for America - Positions 0%
2011-2012 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 20%
2011-2012 PeacePAC - Positions (PeacePAC is sister organization of Council for a Livable World rating House Only) 67%
2011-2012 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights 63%
2011-2012 USA Engage - Positions 75%
2011 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 60%
2011 Arab American Institute - Positions on Arab-American Issues 13%
2011 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score 91%
2011 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 50%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 64%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 33%
2011 Peace Action West - Positions 22%
2010 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 20%
2010 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score A
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 38%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 56%
2010 Peace Action - Positions 38%
2010 Peace Action West - Positions 38%
2009-2010 ACT! for America - Positions 50%
2009-2010 Council for a Livable World - Positions 50%
2009-2010 PeacePAC - Positions (PeacePAC is sister organization of Council for a Livable World rating House Only) 50%
2009-2010 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -2%
2009-2010 USA Engage - Positions 40%
2009-2010 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 40%
2009 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 50%
2009 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 33%
2009 Latin America Working Group - Positions 50%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 24%
2009 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 70%
2009 NewPolicy.org - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy 0%
2009 Peace Action West - Positions 46%
2009 Resolve Uganda - Lifetime Score 0%
2009 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -2%
2008 Armenian National Committee of America - Positions on Armenian American Issues C-
2008 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score A-
2008 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 50%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 43%
2008 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 55%
2008 Peace Action West - Positions 60%
2008 Resolve Uganda - Lifetime Score F
2007-2009 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score A
2007-2008 ACT! for America - Positions 17%
2007-2008 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 60%
2007-2008 Council for a Livable World - Positions 50%
2007-2008 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 50%
2007-2008 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 66%
2007-2008 Population Action International - Positions 100%
2007-2008 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -3
2007-2008 USA Engage - Positions on Trade and Engagement B
2007-2008 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions -1
2007 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score A-
2007 Council for a Livable World - Positions 71%
2007 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 82%
2007 Latin America Working Group - Positions 30%
2007 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 68%
2007 Peace Action West - Positions 55%
2007 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -1
2007 United To End Genocide - Positions on Darfur C
2007 Voices for Creative Nonviolence - Iraq-Afghanistan Supplemental Spending Score 100%
2006-2012 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 57%
2006 Church World Service - Positions 0
2006 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score A+
2006 Latin America Working Group - Positions 40%
2006 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 62%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 37%
2006 Peace Action - Positions 50%
2006 Peace Action West - Positions 50%
2006 United To End Genocide - Positions on Darfur D
2006 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 38%
2005-2006 ACT! for America - Positions 41%
2005-2006 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 81%
2005-2006 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 83%
2005-2006 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 41%
2005-2006 Population Action International - Positions on Reproductive Health 100%
2005-2006 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -5
2005 Church World Service - Positions 75
2005 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score A+
2005 Council on American-Islamic Relations - Positions 100%
2005 Latin America Working Group - Positions 88%
2005 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 60%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 40%
2005 Peace Action - Positions 42%
2005 PeacePAC - Positions 62%
2004 Center for International Policy - Positions 100%
2004 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 50%
2004 Latin America Working Group - Positions 57%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 22%
2004 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 78%
2004 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 67%
2004 Peace Action - Positions 60%
2003-2004 ACT! for America - Positions 37.5%
2003-2004 American Muslims for Jerusalem - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy -3
2003-2004 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 40%
2003-2004 Bread for the World - Positions 100%
2003-2004 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 73%
2003-2004 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 83%
2003-2004 PeacePAC - Positions 82%
2003-2004 Population Action International - Positions 100%
2003-2004 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -3
2003-2004 USA Engage - Positions 80%
2003-2004 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 63%
2003 Bread for the World - Positions 100%
2003 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 78%
2003 Latin America Working Group - Positions 44%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 42%
2003 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 57%
2003 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 0%
2003 Peace Action - Positions 89%
2003 Population Action International - Positions 100%
2003 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -1
2002-2003 Citizens for Global Solutions - Positions 52%
2002 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 25%
2002 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 38%
2002 Peace Action - Positions 30%
2001-2002 American Foreign Service Association - Positions 78%
2001-2002 American Muslims for Jerusalem - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy -2
2001-2002 Bread for the World - Positions 100%
2001-2002 Council for a Livable World - Positions 44%
2001-2002 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 36%
2001-2002 National Foreign Trade Council - Postions 83%
2001-2002 USA Engage - Positions 80%
2001 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 71%
2001 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 36%
2001 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 61%
2001 Peace Action - Positions 13%
2001 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 50%
2000 Bread for the World - Positions 67%
2000 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 64%
2000 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 83%
2000 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 69%
2000 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 28%
2000 Peace Action - Positions 30%
1999-2000 PeacePAC - Positions 29%
1999 Bread for the World - Positions 100%
1999 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 71%
1999 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 83%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 30%
1999 Peace Action - Positions 36%
1998-2002 Center for Security Policy - Positions 36%
1998 Bread for the World - Positions 100%
1998 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 76%
1998 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 5%
1998 National Journal - Liberal on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 90%
1998 Peace Action - Positions 63%
1997-1998 PeacePAC - Positions 63%
1997 Bread for the World - Positions 33%
1997 Center for Security Policy - Positions 50%
1997 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 50%
1997 Peace Action - Positions 0%
1996 Bread for the World - Positions on Addressing World Hunger 83%
1996 Center for Security Policy - Positions 57%
1996 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 37%
1996 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign\Defense Policy 61%
1996 Peace Action - Positions 30%
1996 PeacePAC - Positions 40%
1995-1996 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Peace and Justice Score 67%
1995 Peace Action - Positions 33%
1993-1994 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 60%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top