Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Jay Robert Inslee's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Foreign Affairs

Office: Governor (WA), Democratic

Foreign Affairs

2012 Arab American Institute - Positions on Arab-American Issues 9%
2012 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score 92%
2012 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 0%
2011-2012 ACT! for America - Positions 8%
2011-2012 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 0%
2011-2012 PeacePAC - Positions (PeacePAC is sister organization of Council for a Livable World rating House Only) 100%
2011-2012 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights 63%
2011-2012 USA Engage - Positions 63%
2011 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 40%
2011 Arab American Institute - Positions on Arab-American Issues 13%
2011 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score 91%
2011 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 67%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 24%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 75%
2011 Peace Action West - Positions 56%
2010 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 20%
2010 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score A
2010 Latin America Working Group - Positions (House only) 0%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 89%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 10%
2010 Peace Action - Positions 75%
2010 Peace Action West - Positions 75%
2009-2010 ACT! for America - Positions 50%
2009-2010 Council for a Livable World - Positions 100%
2009-2010 PeacePAC - Positions (PeacePAC is sister organization of Council for a Livable World rating House Only) 100%
2009-2010 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -1%
2009-2010 USA Engage - Positions 40%
2009-2010 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 60%
2009 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 50%
2009 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 50%
2009 Latin America Working Group - Positions 25%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 17%
2009 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 78%
2009 NewPolicy.org - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy 15%
2009 Peace Action West - Positions 62%
2009 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -1%
2008 Armenian National Committee of America - Positions on Armenian American Issues C+
2008 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score A-
2008 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 100%
2008 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 70%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 25%
2008 Peace Action West - Positions 80%
2008 Resolve Uganda - Lifetime Score F
2007-2009 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score A
2007-2008 ACT! for America - Positions 0%
2007-2008 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 30%
2007-2008 Council for a Livable World - Positions 75%
2007-2008 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 50%
2007-2008 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 77%
2007-2008 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -4
2007-2008 USA Engage - Positions on Trade and Engagement B
2007-2008 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions +1
2007 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score A-
2007 Council for a Livable World - Positions 100%
2007 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 100%
2007 Latin America Working Group - Positions 30%
2007 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 94%
2007 Peace Action West - Positions 100%
2007 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -2
2007 United To End Genocide - Positions on Darfur B
2007 Voices for Creative Nonviolence - Iraq-Afghanistan Supplemental Spending Score 83%
2006-2012 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 43%
2006 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score A+
2006 Latin America Working Group - Positions 60%
2006 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 83%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 14%
2006 Peace Action - Positions 79%
2006 Peace Action West - Positions 79%
2006 United To End Genocide - Positions on Darfur C
2006 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 75%
2005-2006 ACT! for America - Positions 18%
2005-2006 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 100%
2005-2006 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 33%
2005-2006 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 91%
2005-2006 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -6
2005 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score A
2005 Council on American-Islamic Relations - Positions 100%
2005 Latin America Working Group - Positions 88%
2005 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 79%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 20%
2005 Peace Action - Positions 83%
2005 PeacePAC - Positions 100%
2004 Center for International Policy - Positions 100%
2004 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 50%
2004 Latin America Working Group - Positions 71%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 16%
2004 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 83%
2004 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 100%
2004 Peace Action - Positions 80%
2003-2004 American Muslims for Jerusalem - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy -2
2003-2004 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 40%
2003-2004 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 93%
2003-2004 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 50%
2003-2004 PeacePAC - Positions 91%
2003-2004 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights +2
2003-2004 USA Engage - Positions 60%
2003-2004 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 100%
2003 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 78%
2003 Latin America Working Group - Positions 44%
2003 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 73%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 25%
2003 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 0%
2003 Peace Action - Positions 89%
2003 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights +1
2002-2006 Voices for Creative Nonviolence - Iraq War Resolution and Funding 40%
2002-2003 Citizens for Global Solutions - Positions 80%
2002 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 25%
2002 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 19%
2002 Peace Action - Positions 70%
2001-2002 American Foreign Service Association - Positions 71%
2001-2002 American Muslims for Jerusalem - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy +3
2001-2002 Council for a Livable World - Positions 78%
2001-2002 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 71%
2001-2002 National Foreign Trade Council - Postions 33%
2001-2002 USA Engage - Positions 40%
2001 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 79%
2001 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 73%
2001 Peace Action - Positions 25%
2000 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 64%
2000 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 83%
2000 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 74%
2000 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 24%
2000 Peace Action - Positions 30%
1999-2000 PeacePAC - Positions 43%
1999 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 71%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 41%
1999 Peace Action - Positions 63%
1998-2002 Center for Security Policy - Positions 30%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top