Search Form
Now choose a category »
 

Jay Robert Inslee's Ratings and Endorsements

Office: Governor (WA), Democratic

Conservative

2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime score 3%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 0%
2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 0%
2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 14%
2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 16%
2011 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 8%
2011 American Conservative Union - Positions 0%
2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 14%
2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 0%
2011 Heritage Action for America - Positions (House Only) 14%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 75%
2011 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 27%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 24%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 10%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 20%
2011 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 10%
2010 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 9%
2010 American Conservative Union - Positions 4%
2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 0%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 10%
2010 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 24%
2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 10%
2009-2010 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 5%
2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 0%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 0%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 0%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2010 10%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 10%
2009 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 9%
2009 American Conservative Union - Positions 0%
2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 0%
2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 0%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 17%
2009 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 25%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 15%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 0%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2009) 30%
2008 American Conservative Union - Positions 12%
2008 Eagle Forum - Positions 40%
2008 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 22.2%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 25%
2007-2009 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 23%
2007-2008 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 5%
2007-2008 Campaign for Working Families - Positions on Conservative Issues 0
2007-2008 Concerned Women for America - Positions 18%
2007-2008 The John Birch Society - Positions 23%
2007 American Conservative Union - Positions 4%
2007 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 0%
2007 Eagle Forum - Positions 0%
2007 GOPUSA - Positions 0%
2007 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 4%
2007 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 19.3%
2007 The John Birch Society - Conservative Index Score 30%
2006 American Conservative Union - Positions 12%
2006 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 5%
2006 Eagle Forum - Positions 0%
2006 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 19.2%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 14%
2006 The John Birch Society - Positions 30%
2005-2006 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 0%
2005-2006 Concerned Women for America - Positions 25%
2005 American Conservative Union - Positions 0%
2005 Eagle Forum - Positions 7%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 16%
2005 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 20%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 20%
2005 The John Birch Society - Positions 25%
2004 American Conservative Union - Positions 4%
2004 Christian Action Network - Lifetime Score 12%
2004 Eagle Forum - Positions 9%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 16%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring) 38%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Fall) 0%
2003-2004 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 7%
2003-2004 Concerned Women for America - Positions 18%
2003 American Conservative Union - Positions 20%
2003 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 9%
2003 Concerned Women for America - Positions 15%
2003 Eagle Forum - Positions 8%
2003 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 23%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 25%
2003 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer) 25%
2002 American Conservative Union - Positions 4%
2002 Eagle Forum - Positions 20%
2002 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 19%
2002 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 22%
2002 The John Birch Society - Positions 30%
2001-2010 Keep America Safe - Positions 16%
2001-2002 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 5%
2001-2002 Concerned Women for America - Positions 17%
2001 American Conservative Union - Positions 4%
2001 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 26%
2001 The John Birch Society - Positions 16%
2000 American Conservative Union - Positions 28%
2000 Concerned Women for America - Positions 38%
2000 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 24%
2000 The John Birch Society - Positions 35%
1999 American Conservative Union - Positions 8%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 41%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 28%
1999 The John Birch Society - Positions 36%
1994 American Conservative Union - Positions 10%
1993 American Conservative Union - Positions 17%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top