Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Raymond 'Gene' Eugene Green's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Foreign Affairs

Office: U.S. House (TX) - District 29, Democratic

Foreign Affairs

2014 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 67%
2014 Peace Action West - Positions (June 3, 2014) 72%
2013-2014 Council for a Livable World - Positions (House) 100%
2013 Arab American Institute - Positions on Arab-American Issues 70%
2013 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 64%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy 37%
2013 Peace Action West - Positions (Nov. 20, 2013) 72%
2012 Arab American Institute - Positions on Arab-American Issues 4%
2012 Armenian National Committee of America - Positions 23%
2012 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score 67%
2012 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 53%
2012 National Journal - House Liberal (Foreign) 60%
2012 Peace Action - Positions 50%
2011-2012 ACT! for America - Positions 92%
2011-2012 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 40%
2011-2012 PeacePAC - Positions (PeacePAC is sister organization of Council for a Livable World rating House Only) 75%
2011-2012 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights 56%
2011-2012 USA Engage - Positions 25%
2011 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 70%
2011 Arab American Institute - Positions on Arab-American Issues 38%
2011 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score 64%
2011 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 33%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 57%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 43%
2011 Peace Action West - Positions 34%
2010 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 44%
2010 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score A-
2010 Latin America Working Group - Positions (House only) 0%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 53%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 47%
2010 Peace Action - Positions 38%
2010 Peace Action West - Positions 38%
2009-2010 ACT! for America - Positions 60%
2009-2010 Council for a Livable World - Positions 50%
2009-2010 PeacePAC - Positions (PeacePAC is sister organization of Council for a Livable World rating House Only) 50%
2009-2010 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -6%
2009-2010 USA Engage - Positions 40%
2009-2010 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 10%
2009 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 50%
2009 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 33%
2009 Latin America Working Group - Positions 0%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 22%
2009 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 77%
2009 NewPolicy.org - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy 0%
2009 Peace Action West - Positions 46%
2009 Resolve Uganda - Lifetime Score 0%
2009 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -4%
2008 Armenian National Committee of America - Positions on Armenian American Issues A-
2008 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score B+
2008 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 50%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 48%
2008 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 50%
2008 Peace Action West - Positions 60%
2008 Resolve Uganda - Lifetime Score F
2007-2009 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score A-
2007-2008 ACT! for America - Positions 33%
2007-2008 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 56%
2007-2008 Council for a Livable World - Positions 50%
2007-2008 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 33%
2007-2008 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 55%
2007-2008 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -3
2007-2008 USA Engage - Positions on Trade and Engagement C
2007-2008 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions -1
2007 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score B
2007 Council for a Livable World - Positions 71%
2007 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 80%
2007 Latin America Working Group - Positions 20%
2007 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 58%
2007 Peace Action West - Positions 50%
2007 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -3
2007 United To End Genocide - Positions on Darfur C
2007 Voices for Creative Nonviolence - Iraq-Afghanistan Supplemental Spending Score 83%
2006-2012 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 0%
2006 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score B-
2006 Latin America Working Group - Positions 30%
2006 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 60%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 39%
2006 Peace Action - Positions 43%
2006 Peace Action West - Positions 43%
2006 United To End Genocide - Positions on Darfur C
2006 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 25%
2005-2006 ACT! for America - Positions 41%
2005-2006 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 63%
2005-2006 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 17%
2005-2006 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 58%
2005-2006 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -8
2005 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score B+
2005 Council on American-Islamic Relations - Positions 0%
2005 Latin America Working Group - Positions 43%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 35%
2005 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 64%
2005 Peace Action - Positions 50%
2005 PeacePAC - Positions 69%
2004 Center for International Policy - Positions 100%
2004 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 50%
2004 Latin America Working Group - Positions 43%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 40%
2004 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 59%
2004 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 67%
2004 Peace Action - Positions 40%
2003-2004 ACT! for America - Positions 87.5%
2003-2004 American Muslims for Jerusalem - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy -9
2003-2004 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 60%
2003-2004 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 47%
2003-2004 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 17%
2003-2004 PeacePAC - Positions 73%
2003-2004 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -5
2003-2004 USA Engage - Positions 20%
2003-2004 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 38%
2003 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 25%
2003 Latin America Working Group - Positions 33%
2003 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 75%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 21%
2003 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 0%
2003 Peace Action - Positions 78%
2003 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -2
2002-2003 Citizens for Global Solutions - Positions 56%
2002 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 25%
2002 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 40%
2002 Peace Action - Positions 30%
2001-2002 American Foreign Service Association - Positions 81%
2001-2002 American Muslims for Jerusalem - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy -6
2001-2002 Council for a Livable World - Positions 33%
2001-2002 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 29%
2001-2002 National Foreign Trade Council - Postions 0%
2001-2002 USA Engage - Positions 0%
2001 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 43%
2001 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 49%
2001 Peace Action - Positions 13%
2001 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 0%
2000 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 64%
2000 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 17%
2000 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 42%
2000 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 56%
2000 Peace Action - Positions 40%
1999-2000 PeacePAC - Positions 57%
1999 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 71%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 35%
1999 Peace Action - Positions 36%
1998-2002 Center for Security Policy - Positions 72%
1998 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 81%
1998 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 37%
1998 National Journal - Liberal on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 61%
1998 Peace Action - Positions 75%
1997-1998 PeacePAC - Positions 75%
1997 Center for Security Policy - Positions 35%
1997 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 80%
1997 Peace Action - Positions 50%
1996 Center for Security Policy - Positions 36%
1996 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign\Defense Policy 73%
1996 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 26%
1996 Peace Action - Positions 40%
1996 PeacePAC - Positions 70%
1995-1996 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Peace and Justice Score 73%
1995 Peace Action - Positions 50%
1993-1994 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 30%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top