Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Samuel 'Sam' Robert Johnson's Ratings and Endorsements

Office: U.S. House (TX) - District 3, Republican
On The Ballot: Running, Republican for U.S. House - District 3

Conservative

2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (Jan. 7, 2014) 80%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score (June 23, 2014) 84%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (June 23, 2014) 75%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score 85%
2014 Heritage Action for America - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 82%
2014 The John Birch Society - Positions 53%
2014 The John Birch Society - Lifetime Score 65%
2013-2014 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2013-2014 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2013-2014 The New American - Positions (captured September 2, 2014) 54%
2013 American Conservative Union - Positions 92%
2013 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 97%
2013 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2013 National Journal - Conservative (Composite) 78%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy 87%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy 68%
2013 The John Birch Society - Positions 67%
2013 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 53
2012 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 98%
2012 American Conservative Union - Ratings of Congress 96%
2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Foreign) 91%
2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Composite Score) 91%
2012 The Club for Growth - Positions 84%
2012 The John Birch Society - Positions 69%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 77%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime score 84%
2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 74%
2011 American Conservative Union - Positions 88%
2011 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 98%
2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 54%
2011 Heritage Action for America - Positions (House Only) 81%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 15%
2011 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 81%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 84%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 89%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 79%
2011 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 79%
2010 American Conservative Union - Positions 100%
2010 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 98%
2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 88%
2010 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 95%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 88%
2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 90%
2009-2010 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 95%
2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2010 90%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 90%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 80%
2009 American Conservative Union - Positions 100%
2009 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 98%
2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2009 ConservAmerica - Positions 11
2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2009 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 89%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 75%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 95%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2009) 90%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 100%
2008 American Conservative Union - Positions 96%
2008 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 95%
2008 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 88.3%
2007-2009 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 78%
2007-2008 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 95%
2007-2008 Campaign for Working Families - Positions on Conservative Issues 100
2007-2008 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2007-2008 ConservAmerica - Positions 0
2007-2008 The John Birch Society - Positions 78%
2007 American Conservative Union - Positions 100%
2007 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 100%
2007 ConservAmerica - Positions 0
2007 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2007 GOPUSA - Positions 20%
2007 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 91%
2007 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 72%
2007 The John Birch Society - Conservative Index Score 80%
2006 American Conservative Union - Positions 90%
2006 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 64%
2006 ConservAmerica - Positions 17
2006 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2006 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 91.3%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 94%
2006 The John Birch Society - Positions 45%
2005-2006 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2005-2006 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2005 American Conservative Union - Positions 96%
2005 ConservAmerica - Positions 0
2005 Eagle Forum - Positions 71%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 89%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 92%
2005 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 94%
2005 The John Birch Society - Positions 25%
2004 American Conservative Union - Positions 100%
2004 Christian Action Network - Lifetime Score 98%
2004 Eagle Forum - Positions 97%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 84%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring) 38%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Fall) 60%
2003-2004 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2003-2004 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2003 American Conservative Union - Positions 88%
2003 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2003 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2003 Eagle Forum - Positions 96%
2003 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 93%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 89%
2003 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer) 63%
2002 American Conservative Union - Positions 100%
2002 Eagle Forum - Positions 93%
2002 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 92%
2002 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 85%
2002 The John Birch Society - Positions 55%
2001-2010 Keep America Safe - Positions 100%
2001-2002 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 97%
2001-2002 Concerned Women for America - Positions 93%
2001 American Conservative Union - Positions 100%
2001 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 97%
2001 The John Birch Society - Positions 80%
2000 American Conservative Union - Positions 100%
2000 Concerned Women for America - Positions 92%
2000 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 88%
2000 The John Birch Society - Positions 71%
1999 American Conservative Union - Positions 96%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 84%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 92%
1999 The John Birch Society - Positions 74%
1998 American Conservative Union - Positions 100%
1998 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 93%
1998 The John Birch Society - Positions 68%
1997-1998 60 Plus Association - Positions 100%
1997-1998 Concerned Women for America - Positions 75%
1997 American Conservative Union - Positions 96%
1997 The John Birch Society - Positions 51%
1996 American Conservative Union - Positions 100%
1996 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 79%
1995-1996 60 Plus Association - Positions 100%
1995-1996 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
1995-1996 The John Birch Society - Positions 62%
1995 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 98%
1995 American Conservative Union - Positions 96%
1994 American Conservative Union - Positions 100%
1993 American Conservative Union - Positions 96%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top