Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Timothy 'Tim' Peter Johnson's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Foreign Affairs

Office: U.S. Senate (SD) - Sr, Democratic

Foreign Affairs

2014 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score 100%
2014 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 100%
2014 Peace Action West - Positions (June 3, 2014) 75%
2013 Arab American Institute - Positions on Arab-American Issues 67%
2013 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 100%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy 0%
2013 Peace Action West - Positions (Nov. 20, 2013) 67%
2012 Arab American Institute - Positions on Arab-American Issues 6%
2012 Armenian National Committee of America - Positions 46%
2012 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score 92%
2012 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 67%
2012 National Journal - Senate Conservative (Foreign) 32%
2012 Peace Action - Positions 44%
2011-2012 ACT! for America - Positions 0%
2011-2012 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 30%
2011-2012 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights 56%
2011-2012 USA Engage - Positions 88%
2011 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 50%
2011 Arab American Institute - Positions on Arab-American Issues 14%
2011 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score 91%
2011 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 40%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 68%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 26%
2011 Peace Action West - Positions 66%
2010 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 0%
2010 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score A
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 47%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 0%
2010 Peace Action - Positions 79%
2010 Peace Action West - Positions 79%
2009-2012 Council for a Livable World - Positions (Senate) 92%
2009-2010 ACT! for America - Positions 50%
2009-2010 Council for a Livable World - Positions 100%
2009-2010 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -6%
2009-2010 USA Engage - Positions 50%
2009-2010 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 25%
2009 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 50%
2009 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 60%
2009 Latin America Working Group - Positions 100%
2009 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 55%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 0%
2009 Peace Action West - Positions 70%
2009 Resolve Uganda - Lifetime Score 25%
2008 Armenian National Committee of America - Positions on Armenian American Issues A
2008 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score B+
2008 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 25%
2008 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 56%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 40%
2008 Peace Action West - Positions 60%
2008 Voices for Creative Nonviolence - Iraq-Afghanistan Supplemental Spending Score %
2007-2009 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score A
2007-2008 ACT! for America - Positions 100%
2007-2008 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 84%
2007-2008 Council for a Livable World - Positions 40%
2007-2008 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights 0
2007-2008 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions -1
2007 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score B+
2007 Council for a Livable World - Positions 22%
2007 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 100%
2007 Latin America Working Group - Positions 25%
2007 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 49%
2007 Peace Action West - Positions 29%
2007 United To End Genocide - Positions on Darfur A
2006-2012 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 50%
2006 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score A-
2006 Latin America Working Group - Positions 33%
2006 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 79%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 16%
2006 Peace Action - Positions 78%
2006 Peace Action West - Positions 78%
2006 United To End Genocide - Positions on Darfur A+
2006 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 33%
2005-2006 ACT! for America - Positions 42%
2005-2006 Council for a Livable World - Positions 83%
2005-2006 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 92%
2005-2006 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 83%
2005-2006 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -2
2005 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score A
2005 Latin America Working Group - Positions 75%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 5%
2005 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 90%
2005 Peace Action - Positions 78%
2005 PeacePAC - Positions 88%
2004 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 50%
2004 Latin America Working Group - Positions 25%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 8%
2004 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 86%
2004 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 100%
2004 Peace Action - Positions 100%
2003-2004 ACT! for America - Positions 50%
2003-2004 American Muslims for Jerusalem - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy -3
2003-2004 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 20%
2003-2004 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 71%
2003-2004 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -4
2003-2004 USA Engage - Positions 20%
2003-2004 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 38%
2003 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 89%
2003 Latin America Working Group - Positions 67%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 0%
2003 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 90%
2003 Peace Action - Positions 100%
2003 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -1
2002-2003 Citizens for Global Solutions - Positions 60%
2002 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 50%
2002 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 33%
2002 Peace Action - Positions 40%
2001-2004 Council for a Livable World - Positions 83%
2001-2002 American Foreign Service Association - Positions 81%
2001-2002 American Muslims for Jerusalem - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy -10
2001-2002 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 25%
2001-2002 USA Engage - Positions 40%
2001 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 77%
2001 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 61%
2001 Peace Action - Positions 29%
2001 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 0%
2000 Council for a Livable World - Positions 75%
2000 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 73%
2000 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 5%
2000 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 89%
2000 Peace Action - Positions 55%
1999-2000 PeacePAC - Positions 75%
1999 Council for a Livable World - Positions 57%
1999 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 42%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 24%
1999 Peace Action - Positions 53%
1998-2002 Center for Security Policy - Positions 25%
1998 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 80%
1998 National Journal - Liberal on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 95%
1998 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 0%
1998 Peace Action - Positions 83%
1997-1998 Council for a Livable World - Positions 80%
1997 Center for Security Policy - Positions 0%
1997 Council for a Livable World - Positions 83%
1997 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 86%
1997 Peace Action - Positions 58%
1996 Center for Security Policy - Positions 43%
1996 Peace Action - Positions 50%
1995 Peace Action - Positions 92%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top