Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Interest Group Evaluations

Interest Group Evaluations

Richard 'Rick' J. Santorum

Conservative

Fall 2004 The John Birch Society - Positions 90%
2006 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 67%
2006 The John Birch Society - Positions 34%
2005-2006 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2005 American Conservative Union - Positions 92%
2005 Eagle Forum - Positions 75%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 74%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 65%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 74%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 65%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 74%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 65%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 74%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 65%
2005 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 90%
2005 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 76%
2005 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 63%
2004 American Conservative Union - Positions 96%
2004 Christian Action Network - Lifetime Score 76%
2004 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
2004 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 75%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 75%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 60%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 71%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 75%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 75%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 60%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 71%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 71%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 60%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 60%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 71%
2004 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 87%
2003-2004 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2003-2004 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2003 American Conservative Union - Positions 90%
2003 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2003 Center for Reclaiming America - Positions 100%
2003 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
2003 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2003 Eagle Forum - Positions 87%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 78%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 78%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 82%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 59%
2003 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 87%
2003 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 87%
2003 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 87%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 59%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 82%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 78%
2003 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 87%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 59%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 82%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 78%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 82%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 59%
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 80
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 80
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 80
2002 American Conservative Union - Positions 95%
2002 Eagle Forum - Positions 64%
2002 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 95
2002 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 95
2002 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 95
2002 The John Birch Society - Positions 74%
2001-2002 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2001-2002 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2001 American Conservative Union - Positions 100%
2001 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
2001 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 90%
2001 The John Birch Society - Positions 90%
2000 American Conservative Union - Positions 100%
2000 Concerned Women for America - Positions 86%
2000 Liberty Lobby - Positions 0%
2000 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 83%
2000 The John Birch Society - Positions 73%
1999-2000 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 92%
1999 American Conservative Union - Positions 88%
1999 Liberty Lobby - Positions 80%
1999 The John Birch Society - Positions 70%
1998 American Conservative Union - Positions 84%
1998 The John Birch Society - Positions 65%
1997-1998 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 91%
1997-1998 Concerned Women for America - Positions 75%
1997 American Conservative Union - Positions 84%
1997 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
1997 Liberty Lobby - Positions 30%
1997 The John Birch Society - Positions 63%
1996 American Conservative Union - Positions 95%
1995-1996 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 92%
1995-1996 Concerned Women for America - Positions 75%
1995-1996 The John Birch Society - Positions 68%
1995 Liberty Lobby - Positions 30%

Conservative

2005 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 57%
2002 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 90%
2002 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 20%
2002 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 60%
2002 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 76%
2002 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 80%
2002 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 39%
2002 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 6%
2002 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 0%
2001 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 7%
2001 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 54%
2001 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 79%
2001 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 86%
2001 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 36%
2001 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 0%
2000 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 0%
2000 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 68%
2000 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 86%
2000 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 84%
2000 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 30%
2000 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 15%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 84%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 54%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 72%
1999 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 45%
1999 National Journal - Liberal on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 10%
1999 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 23%
1998 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 75%
1998 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 73%
1998 National Journal - Liberal on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 12%
1998 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 24%
1998 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 18%
1998 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 72%
1996 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 74%
1996 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 0%
1996 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 72%
1996 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 54%
1996 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 44%
1996 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign\Defense Policy 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

2012 Endorsements

  • Ben Lange
  • Brad Thor
  • Cary Gordon Stands
  • Christopher Conley
  • Dave Mustaine
  • Deborah Long
  • Ed Morrissey
  • Greg Spero
  • Halley Griess
  • Jason Antosz
  • Jeanine Notter
  • Lenette Peterson
  • Matt Swank
  • Sam Clovis
  • Sharron Angle
  • Ted Maravelias
  • Walt Rogers
  • Wes Shuler
Back to top