or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

E.G. 'Bud' Shuster

E.G. 'Bud' Shuster's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Conservative

Full Name: E.G. 'Bud' Shuster

Conservative

2013 The John Birch Society - Positions 70%
2013 The John Birch Society - Positions 70%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 64%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime score 80%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime score 80%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 64%
2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 53%
2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 53%
2000 American Conservative Union - Positions 82%
2000 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 77.5%
2000 Concerned Women for America - Positions 85%
2000 Concerned Women for America - Positions 85%
1999-2000 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 85%
1999-2000 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 88%
1999 American Conservative Union - Positions 82%
1999 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 75%
1999 Legion for the Survival of Freedom, Inc. (formerly Liberty Lobby) - Positions 50%
1999 Legion for the Survival of Freedom, Inc. (formerly Liberty Lobby) - Positions 50%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 77%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 97%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 72%
1999 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 84%
1999 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 59%
1999 The John Birch Society - Positions 61%
1999 The John Birch Society - Positions 61%
1998 American Conservative Union - Positions 96%
1998 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 90%
1998 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 74%
1998 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 68%
1998 National Taxpayers Union - Spending Score 52%
1998 The John Birch Society - Positions 65%
1998 The John Birch Society - Positions 65%
1997-1998 60 Plus Association - Positions 100%
1997-1998 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
1997-1998 Concerned Women for America - Positions 75%
1997-1998 Concerned Women for America - Positions 75%
1997-1998 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100%
1997-1998 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 97%
1997-1998 The Cato Institute - Trade Subsidy Votes Score 33%
1997 American Conservative Union - Positions 84%
1997 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 89%
1997 Legion for the Survival of Freedom, Inc. (formerly Liberty Lobby) - Positions 40%
1997 Legion for the Survival of Freedom, Inc. (formerly Liberty Lobby) - Positions 40%
1997 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100%
1997 National Taxpayers Union - Spending Score 53%
1997 The John Birch Society - Positions 50%
1997 The John Birch Society - Positions 50%
1996 American Conservative Union - Positions 100%
1996 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 82%
1996 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 90%
1996 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 79%
1996 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100%
1995-1996 60 Plus Association - Positions 94%
1995-1996 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
1995-1996 Concerned Women for America - Positions 75%
1995-1996 Concerned Women for America - Positions 75%
1995-1996 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 100%
1995-1996 The John Birch Society - Positions 55%
1995-1996 The John Birch Society - Positions 55%
1995 American Conservative Union - Positions 87%
1995 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 93%
1995 Legion for the Survival of Freedom, Inc. (formerly Liberty Lobby) - Positions 70%
1995 Legion for the Survival of Freedom, Inc. (formerly Liberty Lobby) - Positions 70%
1995 National Taxpayers Union - Spending Score 82%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top